• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Which aspects of test cricket have regressed in the current era?

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Many aspects of the game we can readily acknowledge as having improved, like fielding or hitting.

But what parts of the game can we say have definitely become worse in the past 20 years? Or is it just nostalgia?
 

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
Many aspects of the game we can readily acknowledge as having improved, like fielding or hitting.

But what parts of the game can we say have definitely become worse in the past 20 years? Or is it just nostalgia?
Test batting has definitely gotten worse in the past 8~ years. Don't think that's down to T20 as much as it is pitch conditions, wobble ball etc but it's worth noting.
 

Raz0r6ack

U19 12th Man
Test batting has waned overall. Nations like South Africa, England, Pakistan & Sri Lanka just don't have the same quantity of quality of Test batsmen that they had 10-15 years ago.

New Zealand is the outlier and has actually gotten better in this regard.
 

Brook's side

International Regular
Test batting has waned overall. Nations like South Africa, England, Pakistan & Sri Lanka just don't have the same quantity of quality of Test batsmen that they had 10-15 years ago.

New Zealand is the outlier and has actually gotten better in this regard.
England probably has their strongest batting line up for at least 15 years, and maybe more than 50 years.

In fact no other test line up in history for any country has demonstrated that they are capable of what England's current batting line up has done.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
England's batting is worse than it was 15 years ago because we had a stronger opening pair, but that's it, and it's because we've had like 3 good opening partnerships since the ameteur era.
 

Molehill

Cricketer Of The Year
How about spin bowling? Is there any team with a better spinner now than they had say 15-20 years ago?

The answer maybe India, but if you include Kumble then he'd be at least the match of Ashwin.
 

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
How about spin bowling? Is there any team with a better spinner now than they had say 15-20 years ago?
India definitely has better spin bowling. Pak are probably better than they were 15-20 years ago, they had Yasir shah for a while and have abrar now. Who did England have 15-20 years ago? Don't think swann/Monty where playing consistently in that era and Rehan/leach is better then alot of other guys, moeen was handy too. South Africa definitely have better spin.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Test batting has waned overall. Nations like South Africa, England, Pakistan & Sri Lanka just don't have the same quantity of quality of Test batsmen that they had 10-15 years ago.

New Zealand is the outlier and has actually gotten better in this regard.
The names are lesser but the actual output of Australia is certainly better. Recall that 10-15 years ago was the era of Australia regularly getting shot out for double digit scores, especially away.

England probably has their strongest batting line up for at least 15 years, and maybe more than 50 years.

In fact no other test line up in history for any country has demonstrated that they are capable of what England's current batting line up has done.
what
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
England's batting is worse than it was 15 years ago because we had a stronger opening pair, but that's it, and it's because we've had like 3 good opening partnerships since the ameteur era.
Boycott-Edrich
Vaughn-Trescothick
Strauss-Cook

Reckon that might actually be the most of anyone in that period. SA, WI and India have had 1 notable pair that I can think of in that period. 2 for Oz and none for Pak.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
England's batting in its Strauss era peak was better than it is now. Obviously much less fun to watch though.
 

Howe_zat

Audio File
How about spin bowling? Is there any team with a better spinner now than they had say 15-20 years ago?
Maybe half of them?

India comfortably.

For England, Leach is better than having Giles/Dawson/whoever, probably about the same as Panesar.

West Indies had no spinner at all in the early to mid 2000s

Bangladesh have probably their top 3 spinners ever in the team right now

Pakistan are a bit chaotic as is their wont but I think Yasir Shah, who is still playing, is much better than say Kaneria was
 
Last edited:

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Maybe half to them?

India comfortably.

For England, Leach is better than having Giles/Dawson/whoever, probably about the same as Panesar.

West Indies had no spinner at all in the early to mid 2000s

Bangladesh have probably their top 3 spinners ever in the team right now

Pakistan are a bit chaotic as is their wont but I think Yasir Shah, who is still playing. is much better than say Kaneria was
Yasir Shah's been done for about 4 years though. And poor Kaneria had to put up with both Kamran Akmal and 500 par roads. Decent player rekt by circumstances.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Maybe half to them?

India comfortably.

For England, Leach is better than having Giles/Dawson/whoever, probably about the same as Panesar.

West Indies had no spinner at all in the early to mid 2000s

Bangladesh have probably their top 3 spinners ever in the team right now

Pakistan are a bit chaotic as is their wont but I think Yasir Shah, who is still playing. is much better than say Kaneria was
Australia meanwhile was picking Beau Casson, Xavier Doherty and Michael Beer

Just astonishing to think that we've gone from Cameron White to three frontline spinners and they're all... doing well? What is this
 

Molehill

Cricketer Of The Year
India definitely has better spin bowling. Pak are probably better than they were 15-20 years ago, they had Yasir shah for a while and have abrar now. Who did England have 15-20 years ago? Don't think swann/Monty where playing consistently in that era and Rehan/leach is better then alot of other guys, moeen was handy too. South Africa definitely have better spin.
Swann debuted in 2008, Monty 2 years earlier, both far better than Leach. If we say 10-20 years then it's a no brainer.

I think we need at least 20 Tests to do a comparison, so cannot really use the likes of Rehan or Abrar. Kaneria did pick up 260 Test Wickets which is more than Yasir. A like for like those two.

I think you could argue England, Australia, Sri Lanka, NZ are clearly far weaker (although bit harsh on Lyon). SA a fair bit better, not so sure about Pakistan and WI. India also had Harbhajan with over 400 wickets, so again not a massive difference to Ashwin.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Swann debuted in 2008, Monty 2 years earlier, both far better than Leach. If we say 10-20 years then it's a no brainer.

I think we need at least 20 Tests to do a comparison, so cannot really use the likes of Rehan or Abrar. Kaneria did pick up 260 Test Wickets which is more than Yasir. A like for like those two.

I think you could argue England, Australia, Sri Lanka, NZ are clearly far weaker (although bit harsh on Lyon). SA a fair bit better, not so sure about Pakistan and WI. India also had Harbhajan with over 400 wickets, so again not a massive difference to Ashwin.
The thing about Australia is that it's such a sharp divide. Obviously prior to January 2007 it was ATG standard. Then after that it probably wasn't even Test standard for quite some time.

Harbhajan wouldn't make India's current side. Ashwin and Jadeja are a massive upgrade IMO. Axar less so but his batting is a lot better (well, except for against NZ).
 

Top