• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ravindra Jadeja vs Nathan Lyon

Who is the better test bowler?

  • Ravindra Jadeja

    Votes: 23 53.5%
  • Nathan Lyon

    Votes: 20 46.5%

  • Total voters
    43

Sunil1z

International Regular
Lyon is the better bowler. Jadeja the better cricketer. Lyon is highly under rated because of his overall numbers .

My rankings of different spinners
Warne/Murali > Kumble > Ashwin > Lyon > Jadeja > Swann/Macgill/Herath > Saqlain


Saqlain at last due to very low longevity.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Lyon is the better bowler. Jadeja the better cricketer. Lyon is highly under rated because of his overall numbers .

My rankings of different spinners
Warne/Murali > Kumble > Ashwin > Lyon > Jadeja > Swann/Macgill/Herath > Saqlain


Saqlain at last due to very low longevity.
Saqlain should be with MacGill and Swann as they also had longevity issues.
 

Sunil1z

International Regular
Saqlain should be with MacGill and Swann as they also had longevity issues.
Macgill didn’t have longevity issue . He had Warne issue imo . Australia rarely played 2 spinners .

I am confused regarding Swann tbh . Him and Saqlain have nearly same record .
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Macgill didn’t have longevity issue . He had Warne issue imo . Australia rarely played 2 spinners .

I am confused regarding Swann tbh . Him and Saqlain have nearly same record .
Yeah hard to separate Saqlain and Swann, tho both slightly better than MacGill for me for was too loose at times.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Lol

There’s a reason he’s often overlooked away
Ashwin sucks because Jadeja sometimes gets picked ahead of him.
Jadeja sucks because Ashwin sometimes gets picked ahead of him.

Lyon is better than both because Agar sucks no-one gets picked ahead of him.

I actually do think Lyon is the best of the three. But you need to learn to make better than surface level arguments that can picked apart with a moment's thought, man. You do my position a disservice here.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Lol

There’s a reason he’s often overlooked away
The reason is that India have two great spinners.

You dumb ****.

Edit : Also, most everyone agrees that ashwin should have actually been selected most of those games. Pinning incorrect selections as proof of why the guy isn't as good is moronic.
 

Top