Question on ban announcements

[mr_mister]

James has to keep the sponsorship happy

 

[Daemon]

Name (infraction points, number of days the infraction stays on)
General warning (0,42)
Inappropriate language (3,42)
Not posting in English (3,42)
Frivolous reporting of posts (3,42)
Off-topic discussion in thread (3,42)
Repetitive posting (5,42)
Avoiding swear filter (5,42)
Inappropriate ***ual references (5,42)
Trolling or baiting (5,42)
Plagiarism, not referencing sources (8,42)
Discussion of piracy (8,42)
Slander (8,42)
Ignoring moderator instructions (8,42)
Lack of respect for, insulting, or harassment of other members (8,90)
Continual disobedience (20,90)
Requesting/posting illegal downloads (20,90)
Posting offensive material (40,90)
Serial offender (40,90)
Advertising (40,42)
General spam (40,42)
Multiple accounts (40,90)
Disparaging comments on race/***uality/personal circumstances (50,90)

DId he get plagiarism and then ignoring instructions/continual disobedience? Or just multiple instances of the former.

 

[honestbharani]

They were posted without any links or attribution, so he was.

Nah, you are just being pedantic for the sake of it. I dont think CW forums show up as news in searches and he very clearly has other posts where he posts his own opinion which clearly shows he is not comfortable enough in English for those articles to be his work.

I definitely do not agree with this ban and it just seems silly that plagiarism is considered a reason to rid someone who seemed more enthusiastic about following the game than most here.

 

[Spark]

DId he get plagiarism and then ignoring instructions/continual disobedience? Or just multiple instances of the former.

Failure to respect IP

 

[Daemon]

Failure to respect IP

Where's that in the infraction list thingy?

 

[Spark]

Where's that in the infraction list thingy?

It's next to continual disobedience. I now notice that he had infraction points for spamming that hadn't yet expired, that's what pushed the ban length so high.

 

[Daemon]

It's next to continual disobedience. I now notice that he had infraction points for spamming that hadn't yet expired, that's what pushed the ban length so high.

Forum Rule Changes including Introduction of Infraction System

Due to input from many members as well as the moderator team, we are announcing a change in moderating rules which will become effective shortly. This announcement is being posted here in order for members to give the moderator team their comments on the proposed system prior to its launch...

www.cricketweb.net

Don't see it, only plagiarism

 

[RossTaylorsBox]

he clearly wasn't trying to pass them off as his own or anything though right? so again i return to - who gives?

How the **** did you graduate

 

[Athlai]

Yarr me hearties

 

[Victor Ian]

We need less academic standards here. Everyone plagiarises, just that some change the words and that somehow makes it ok.

If you can copy paste relevant content, I think that displays a sound enough understanding of the topic to earn a pass.

 

[CricAddict]

How the **** did you graduate

I didn't know a graduation in law required cw certification.

 

[RossTaylorsBox]

Yeah that's what I'm saying, genius

 

[CricAddict]

Yeah that's what I'm saying, genius

Ha ha. Got it now.

 

[Shady Slim]

They were posted without any links or attribution, so he was.

this is an enormous leap of logic given he clearly wasn't trying to unless you impose thievy intent on his brain that clearly was not there

 

[HeathDavisSpeed]

this is an enormous leap of logic given he clearly wasn't trying to unless you impose thievy intent on his brain that clearly was not there

You're just worried in case you get scooped up in the purge.

 

[Shady Slim]

You're just worried in case you get scooped up in the purge.

i'd like to think i offer a little bit more than daniel cc and those of his ilk

 

[HeathDavisSpeed]

i'd like to think i offer a little bit more than daniel cc and those of his ilk

Hmmmm. Yes, you might like to think that.

 

[duffer]

this is an enormous leap of logic given he clearly wasn't trying to unless you impose thievy intent on his brain that clearly was not there

Yeah, we might as well ban smali for his work in the 'original' jokes thread. That was far more offensive

 

[anil1405]

Do mods have the power to ban the real Kohli from playing test cricket too? ?

 

[Gnske]

James has to keep the sponsorship happy

He clearly doesn't give a rats. I tried to tell everyone about the benefits of Betway (Bet YOUR Way) during COVID and all I got was a ban.