• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England in NZ 2023

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
One them is Wagner though. Feel like he will go for runs regardless.
Yeah true, but I think tactically I'd play Henry and Southee normally and then try to flog Bracewell (and Mitchell if/when he bowls).

England will probably just try to flog them all though. The meme seems almost self-perputating - I don't think they really were doing that when people first started accusing them of it.
 

nzfan

International Vice-Captain
Pitches like this finishes off careers. Is Crawley finished after this?

The ball is seaming like a mile. Imagine being the local domestic side playing on this sort of decks or even worse all year round. I know firebirds the local domestic side get a lot of stick for their batting but some of the decks dished out are even worse than this. It's such a lottery batting.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
The NZ selectors would probably justify selecting Macewell and Mitchell as 4th and 5th bowlers as being the same formula that was successful in the past, when Santner and De Grandhomme were 4th and 5th.

While Macewell approx equals Santner as a test bowler, that old formula used to work because our 5th bowler CDG was better than our 4th and almost frontline bowler level in many conditions. Certainly >>>> Mitchell. That's no slight on Mitchell's part-timers, it just tells us that in this side we should select an actual frontline 4th bowler.
 

Top