Sunil1z
International Regular
Well Chopra and Prasad are fighting over KL Rahul . Atleast Kuldeep is much better player.Relax guys. Kuldeep ****ing Yadav is not worth fighting over..........
yet.
Well Chopra and Prasad are fighting over KL Rahul . Atleast Kuldeep is much better player.Relax guys. Kuldeep ****ing Yadav is not worth fighting over..........
yet.
can’t wait for the inevitable Kuldeep vs Ashwin threads 10-15 years into the futureRelax guys. Kuldeep ****ing Yadav is not worth fighting over..........
yet.
Any left handed flickers?Second rarest.
Rarest are finger flickers (Iverrson, Mendis and Gleeson) and ones who use wrist to bowl off breaks (Murali and Prasanna).
They are rare because it is difficult.
Iverson was the original.Any left handed flickers?
Just forgot Akeil Hossein of West Indies.Any left handed flickers?
To pick up wickets in BAn, you don't need fancy balls. You runup and bowl wicket to wicket and variable spin and bounce will do the work for you.I'm pretty sure the number of SLAs coming out of Bangladesh that there will be at least one 'flicker', eh?
And despite this it will generally be found that leg-spinners are more expensive and less effective most of the time.Surprised at so many ppl equating left arm leggies with right handed offies. It isn't only about the direction in which the ball is supposed to spin; there's more potential for turn, dip, bounce - more work on the ball basically - and overall deception with legspin.
I always have time for left-arm wrist spinners, I used to bowl them myself when I played cricket before going on to become an umpire. It's difficult because there are more right-handers in world cricket (more right-handers in general throughout the world) and as a left-arm wrist spinner - you need to keep it tight...not a lot to work with in terms of you need to keep the ball outside off stump, anything on middle stump or worse and the ball turns down legside if bowling the leggie. Plus a ball is much more dangerous when turning away from the batsman - more opportunities to get a batter out when the ball is turning away.Going by averages, Bevan might have been the one of the most effective to ever bowl the style in tests. Which is funny
Whilst his Tests stats as a bowler aren't flash, he only played a handful of Test matches and played in the wrong era of Australia cricket because Warne and MacGill were ahead of him. He would be playing Test cricket for Australia if he played nowdays. Also he was a handy lower order batsman too - averaged 20 in ODI cricket, 26 in Test cricket and 35 in First-Class cricket, he was a better batsman then Warne and MacGill. So overall in that period he was peobably the third best wrist spinner in Australia.Brad Hogg was a great ODI wristspinner , helped Australia win two odi world cups
34 WC wickets @19.24 probably the most underrated spinner in Cricket World Cup history
First ClassLeading first-class wicket-takers among this type of bowler:
George Tribe 1378 wickets @ 20
Jack Walsh 1190 @ 24
Compton 622 @ 32
Fleetwood-Smith 597 @ 22
Johnny Martin 445 @ 31
Paul Adams 412 @ 32
Shamsi 334 @ 26
Inshan Ali 328 @ 28
Sandakan 283 @ 26
Kline 276 @ 27
Those with more than a hundred wickets, but less than two hundred, include Brad Hogg, David Sincock, Kuldeep Yadav, Bevan and Katich. Also Sobers and Wardle when they bowled in this style. There may be others.
To succeed with this type of bowling it has usually been necessary to have a good googly, and most of these bowlers were difficult to pick.
Wardle would have finished with the lowest average, but a high proportion of his wickets came during a single season in South Africa. He was more accurate than most but apparently did not come off the pitch as quickly as those who bowled wrist-spin regularly. This was part of the reason he was rarely asked to bowl it in England.
Michael Rippon 124 @ 34.41First Class
Dave Mohammed: 233 @ 27.11
Brad Hogg: 181 @ 40.51
David Sincock: 159 @ 36.87
Kuldeep Yadav: 134 @ 29.76
Beau Casson: 123 @ 43.04
Michael Bevan: 119 @ 44.89
Simon Katich: 107 @ 35.30
#randomkiwiMichael Rippon 124 @ 34.41
I bowled right arm leg breaks, and I found left handers very enjoyable to bowl at. It only needed change of perspective of your bowling. Against left handers , your stock ball has to be top spinner or leg spinner with plenty of overspin, producing dip and bounce and threatening outside edge. If you can bowl cross seam leggies, you can then easily slip in the normal legspinner, which will pitch little fuller and spin back. If you have bowled your topspinners well, batsman will now be on back foot shaping to cut everything. Normal lagbreak will spin back, keep low (because it is fuller) and most of the time beat the cut to the sumps.I always have time for left-arm wrist spinners, I used to bowl them myself when I played cricket before going on to become an umpire. It's difficult because there are more right-handers in world cricket (more right-handers in general throughout the world) and as a left-arm wrist spinner - you need to keep it tight...not a lot to work with in terms of you need to keep the ball outside off stump, anything on middle stump or worse and the ball turns down legside if bowling the leggie. Plus a ball is much more dangerous when turning away from the batsman - more opportunities to get a batter out when the ball is turning away.
As for Bevan, his bowling average in Test cricket was 26, not bad for a part-timer.