An innings and 39 runs is a thrashing.1-1 is not a thrashing, especially at home.
Even Bangladesh comes up with these results every here and there.
All 3 are big minnows away. And are barely test standard at home. Bangladesh probably not even test standard.
Sri Lanka beats mostly only fellow minnows at home (Bangers, WI, Zim). They can't win a series at home against any big nation (Ind, Aus, Eng) or even other test standard nations. At best, they can win a test.
Best they could do was draw a series at home with as favourable pitches as they could possibly make that Aus would be the worst on. Even Bangladesh could do that. Then when they tour Aus they would actually get thrashed, like proper thrashed, every game. Genuine minnows.Thrashed Oz last year
Agreed, in the 90s, there were no minnows, imo.Is there some requirement to always have a minnow in every era? Minnow doesn't just mean "worst team in the world currently" you know, unless we're using the word in ways it's never used.
If everyone loses, aren't we all winners?Thankfully the collective mediocrity and weakness of the mid-tier teams today will ensure no team can fall too far behind the others.
Just when you think one team is sinking badly, another team will begin to lose also.
Nah everyone is a loser then sorryIf everyone loses, aren't we all winners?
Edit: Sorry, I'm trying this new CW Cricket Chat self-help affirmative psychology thing. Let me know if it's making an impact for you.
So? All teams who've been to Australia outside of India have been thoroughly dispatched. Didn't RSA lose a test in 2 days?WI were embarrassingly bad in Oz this summer and no better than a good club team
Confident in my belief that they wouldn’t win a game in the state competitions
SL would be the same or worse
Not sure about that, we've been probably the hardest side to beat away (i.e. in India) probably since the 70's or so!India can't hide behind raging turners forever