• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Meaningless and stupid cricket statistics

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
No. of cricketers who average 50+ by country

43 total

Australia - 11 (2 current)
England - 8
West Indies - 8
South Africa - 4
India - 4
Pakistan - 4 (1 current)
New Zealand - 2 (2 current)
Sri Lanka - 1
Zimbabwe - 1

63 are listed on the cricinfo stats page (everyone above 48) Bumps em up to Aus - 16, Eng - 12, WI - 9, SA - 7, Pak - 7, Ind - 6, SL - 3, NZ - 2, Zim - 1
If you'd done this 24 hours ago (or if Babar Azam hadn't made that strange declaration) NZ would only have 1, with Devon Conway playing his 20th (and qualifying) innings. If Daryl Mitchell gets two bats against Pakistan in the 2nd test he'll also join the 50+ group even if he gets a pair.
 
Last edited:

Victor Ian

International Coach
Eh I only thought to do 50+ but cricinfo lists all from 48+ on the top averages page so I chucked it in there in case anyone was interested.
Don't mind me. I was thinking you listed 43 players over 50 while Cricinfo was listing 63. Compounded by think everyone above was stating everyone in the above list totalled 48 players rather than the qualification of everyone with an average more than 48.
It's the last day of the year. I've used up my brain allotment and have to wait for tomorrow for the next instalment.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
The qualification of 20 innings rather than 1,000 runs annoys me if for no other reason than it winds me up that Ernest Tyldesley made 990 runs in 20 innings and his average counts, but Sid Barnes made 1,072 runs in 19 innings and his average doesn't.
The funniest thing would be if a no 10/11 had 20 innings with 19 not outs and had an average better than/close to Bradman.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The qualification of 20 innings rather than 1,000 runs annoys me if for no other reason than it winds me up that Ernest Tyldesley made 990 runs in 20 innings and his average counts, but Sid Barnes made 1,072 runs in 19 innings and his average doesn't.
I've never thought of that, it is pretty silly. Barnes was robbed of immortality
 

Coronis

International Coach
Just reading about Southee in the NZ/Pak thread, it amuses me that all of the Fab Four became captains and now none of them are Test captains.
 

the big bambino

International Captain
Most if not all those stories are from people with an axe to grind. He had enemies but there were many more who praised him.
 

Coronis

International Coach
Captains who improved on their career stats

Sangakkara 15 matches 1601 runs @ 69.60 (+12.20)
Jayawardene 36 matches 3665 runs @ 59.11 (+9.27)
Gooch 34 matches 3582 runs @ 58.72 (+16.14)
Crowe 16 matches 1466 runs @ 54.29 (+8.93)
Malik 12 matches 1047 runs @ 52.35 (+8.64)
Imran 48 matches 2408 runs @ 52.34 (+15.65), 187 wickets @ 20.26 (-2.55)
Pollock 26 matches 998 runs @ 41.58 (+9.27), 103 wickets @ 21.36 (-1.75)
Kapil 34 matches 1364 runs @ 31.72 (+0.67), 111 wickets @ 26.35 (-3.29)
Bedi 24 matches 106 wickets @ 24.82 (-3.89)
Willis 18 matches 77 wickets @ 21.59 (-3.61)
Fazal 10 matches 41 wickets @ 19.14 (-5.56)

Also jeez one awful reversal.

Vaughan
As captain: 51 matches 3170 runs @ 36.02
Not as captain: 31 matches 2549 runs @ 50.98

Couldn’t hack it
 
Last edited:

AndrewB

International Vice-Captain
Azharuddin possibly?
Azharuddin scored 102 in his 99th (and final) Test, which is as close as anyone has got to scoring 99 (jointly with Steve Waugh, who scored 96).

Chanderpaul scored 97 in his 97th Test, which I think is a record (for highest score in the same numbered Test).

On a vaguely related note, the lowest score that no-one's made on debut is 111.
 

Kenneth Viljoen

International Regular
Most runs or wickets since a certain players debut , you don't need to go through those lengths to show somebody is in form .
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
Mike Smith (Eng) and Greg Blewett (Aus) are the only 2 batsmen to be dismissed for 99 twice in tests, both ending up wjth less than 5 centuries as a result. Misbah holds the distinction of being the only batsmen in test history to be dismissed for 99 and left on 99*.
John Wright also had two 99s.
 

Top