Cricket related thread that does not really deserve its own stuff

[ParwazHaiJunoon]

Ban mods for removing UNESCO recognized Words from thread title.

 

[sledger]

Ban mods

yeah

 

[Red]

Is a “mankad” recorded in the score book as a run out?

 

[honestbharani]

Is a “mankad” recorded in the score book as a run out?

Its not called a mankad, for starters.

 

[Red]

Its not called a mankad, for starters.

Thanks Einstein. For the sake of discussing it, everyone knows what it means though

 

[honestbharani]

Thanks Einstein. For the sake of discussing it, everyone knows what it means though

You are welcome, Edison.


Now here's Mel Farrell to educate you a bit more.

 

[Shri]

Thanks Einstein. For the sake of discussing it, everyone knows what it means though

yeah but do you

 

[Red]

yeah but do you

Do I know what “mankad” means colloquially? Yeh.

 

[cnerd123]

Do I know what “mankad” means colloquially? Yeh.

If you know what the mode of dismissal is actually called then the question you asked has a pretty obvious answer

 

[Red]

If you know what the mode of dismissal is actually called then the question you asked has a pretty obvious answer

My question was how is it recorded in the scorebook? Just as a generic runout? Nevermind, whatever. I’ll just look it up like I should’ve done before the bloc got all fidgety about it

 

[cnerd123]

It's a runout so you record it as a runout, yes. I don't understand why that's a question. Does a bowled off an inside edge get recorded differently to a normal bowled?

 

[Daemon]

Not sure why people are jumping on red here. Seemed like an honest question.

 

[Red]

It's a runout so you record it as a runout, yes. I don't understand why that's a question. Does a bowled off an inside edge get recorded differently to a normal bowled?

It seems a different type of dismissal to a normal runout, and hence my question. However it appears it’d be recorded as a normal run out.


“38.3 Non-striker leaving his/her ground early

38.3.1 If the non-striker is out of his/her ground at any time from the moment the ball comes into play until the instant when the bowler would normally have been expected to release the ball, the non-striker is liable to be Run out. In these circumstances, the non-striker will be out Run out if he/she is out of his/her ground when his/her wicket is put down by the bowler throwing the ball at the stumps or by the bowler’s hand holding the ball, whether or not the ball is subsequently delivered.”

Thanks for your help with this, I won’t need any more from you regarding this matter.

 

[Shri]

Do I know what “mankad” means colloquially? Yeh.

Vinoo Mankad was a former Indian cricketer

 

[Red]

Vinoo Mankad was a former Indian cricketer

Yeh, I know that

 

[honestbharani]

It seems a different type of dismissal to a normal runout

There are different types of bowled and caught behinds as well. Heck, even LBWs.

 

[Shri]

Yeh, I know that

unless you want to call idiots getting punched in bars being "Warnered" as a kind of representation of thuggish aussie culture, you will stop referring to runouts as mankads

you ****ing moron

 

[RossTaylorsBox]

Oh is a Mankad bad now

 

[Red]

unless you want to call idiots getting punched in bars being "Warnered" as a kind of representation of thuggish aussie culture, you will stop referring to runouts as mankads

you ****ing moron

Where the **** did this come from? Jesus

 

[Red]

There are different types of bowled and caught behinds as well. Heck, even LBWs.

Yeh ok. Whatever. Ffs. It was a legit question but now I’m ****ing sorry I asked it. Christ