• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Australia vs South Africa -2022/3

Number 11

State Regular
Could be worse for SA I’d we hadn’t bowled dross in the first few overs and given away 10 leg byes.

Looks an ideal wicket for Boland so far
 

halba

International 12th Man
Could be worse for SA I’d we hadn’t bowled dross in the first few overs and given away 10 leg byes.

Looks an ideal wicket for Boland so far
Cummins starting to move the ball now. This is dangerous and they have no specialist batting left.
 

halba

International 12th Man
Knowing how thin the top 5 are, why didn't de Bruyn play? Rotate nortje for team balance purposes. Saf selectors are gamblers.
 

The_CricketUmpire

U19 Captain
Umpires call..almost a run out total shambles
Thats right - umpires call. If it was called not out and Aussie's decide to review it then it would of still been not out as less then 50% of a ball was hitting stumps according to hawkeye. This is why, in my opinion, it looked a tad high in the first instance. For me, some doubt
 

Top