By casuals yes but I've read some baffling stuff about him on here and it's not overrating him.I would say Akram is also a bit overrated.
Yeah, 52% of the votes is insane lol.Dravid won some Wisden poll as India's best ever batsman a while ago which is.. questionable.
Dravid is loved by many Indians and not just the regular cricket fans but even casuals for his character and personality and the cricket followers often like his selflessness, team first attitude and compare it to Tendulkar who they call selfish and individual records obsessed which is why you get crazy poll results like thatDravid won some Wisden poll as India's best ever batsman a while ago which is.. questionable.
I really don't think so. Most people here don't rate him much.And Javed Miandad.
Akram was hugely talented but he underachieved. He was the most complete bowler imo but when the going got tough, he gave up. He relied too much on talent.By casuals yes but I've read some baffling stuff about him on here and it's not overrating him.
Javed was a satirical follow-up to the Akram nomination to try and get a bite out of Trundler. I don’t think he’s overrated tbh.I really don't think so. Most people here don't rate him much.
Akram was hugely talented but he underachieved. He was the most complete bowler imo but when the going got tough, he gave up. He relied too much on talent.
Mcgrath on the otherhand overachieved imo. His stats look that good because he had such good batsmen put up the runs to pressure opponents and bowling support so to not release pressure build up by him. If say he was instead of them, his stats won't be as good as they look now.
For me the best Indian bats areDravid won some Wisden poll as India's best ever batsman a while ago which is.. questionable.
There weren't that many voting at the start, and when it came to 20 (or whatever) deep, there was a lot of drawing names randomly. I would be seriously surprised if Dravid got less than 75% in a head to head.Exclusively a CW/nerd thing. Pietersen is supremely overrated outside CW. He came in ahead of Dravid on CW's list. Of course this is one of my more nitpicky hills.
Barrington got some early support in that exercise and it was a tie when they went head to headThere weren't that many voting at the start, and when it came to 20 (or whatever) deep, there was a lot of drawing names randomly. I would be seriously surprised if Dravid got less than 75% in a head to head.
Pieterson/DravidBarrington got some early support in that exercise and it was a tie when they went head to head
I think he was referring to Barrington. Pietersen didn’t make the top 50.There weren't that many voting at the start, and when it came to 20 (or whatever) deep, there was a lot of drawing names randomly. I would be seriously surprised if Dravid got less than 75% in a head to head.
Coolio, i may be misunderstandingI think he was referring to Barrington. Pietersen didn’t make the top 50.
Chappells underrated here.Chappell's cold numbers are remarkably flawless so it's easy to get carried away with him. Distribution against opponents home and away and for what it's worth scored heavily in WSC/FC too. It's more that he wasn't tested enough. Personally think better than Ponting and Border, but clearly below Smith already.
Especially Trevor. Could've been a great lawn or ten-pin bowler.Chappells underrated here.