• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Viv Richards vs Sachin Tendulkar

Who was better?


  • Total voters
    55

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
He needed 20 in the last innings to ensure a 50 average and scored 60. There is a youtube clip on this innings.

He was very conservative through the innings, seemingly aware of the landmark. Or someone else made him aware. A very un-Viv like innings !

I think these benchmarks definitely matter to elite players. Lara's average fell below 50 and that was a big motivator for him to do well in that 2001 SL series. Inzi was averaging above 50 until his last test when it dropped I believe, I am sure it stings. It is one of the reasons I think it would be a tragedy for a batsman of Kohli's class to end averaging sub-50.
 

Johan

International 12th Man
The jump between Viv and the next greatest batsman of his generation was much bigger compared to that between Tendulkar and Lara/Ponting. Especially in terms of optics and attacking aesthetics for that era. Only natural for players that played with Richards to rate him the undisputed best among contemporaries.
No , what have you done , some idiot is gonna come and mention Gavaskar and turn it into Viv vs Gavaskar.
 

Slifer

International Captain
I think these benchmarks definitely matter to elite players. Lara's average fell below 50 and that was a big motivator for him to do well in that 2001 SL series. Inzi was averaging above 50 until his last test when it dropped I believe, I am sure it stings. It is one of the reasons I think it would be a tragedy for a batsman of Kohli's class to end averaging sub-50.
Worrell had a 50 plus average from test #1 and it fell below 50 in his very last test...damn shame.
 

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
Both of them were clearly better than Lara IMO.

Viv, Tendy, Sobers and Hobbs are the strongest contenders for 2nd best batsman of all time..

For me, Viv > Tendy > Sobers

Not really sure where to rank Hobbs as I personally find it impossible to compare him with the others.
Its Sobers Vs Sachin Vs Hobbs.

Viv slightly below these 3, as most people select Sobers above Viv as the best WI batsman.
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I agree with that pretty much ^ as people generally put Hobbs slightly above Hutton and Hammond too

Though I think Lara has a tiny argument for being considered level with Sachin despite losing points for consistency, he had those mammoth scores

The 277, the 375, the 400 and the 501, Lara had a god mode like nobody else, hence him being the FC and test high score holder which I think is such a cool feather in his cap
 

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
The jump between Viv and the next greatest batsman of his generation was much bigger compared to that between Tendulkar and Lara/Ponting. Especially in terms of optics and attacking aesthetics for that era. Only natural for players that played with Richards to rate him the undisputed best among contemporaries.
1.Sobers, Crowe.. Etc rated Gavaskar higher.
2. Absence of Barry Richards

Ponting and Chappell never been considered as 2nd only to Bradman Category. ( on Global level )
 

Chrish

International Debutant
Its Sobers Vs Sachin Vs Hobbs.

Viv slightly below these 3, as most people select Sobers above Viv as the best WI batsman.
I have considered Viv as the best batsman of covered wicket era as far back as I can remember once I became a somewhat knowledgeable cricket fan.

What sets him apart from the rest is he made the bowlers fearful of bowling to him rather than vice versa. He is probably the only player in whole history who would stare right back at the pace bowler with hostility and sometimes even mockery when they tried to bounce him. I doubt any other players were that courageous. Richards’ gaze at 1:20 is what I am referring to.

 
Last edited:

Migara

International Coach
There were few other batsmen who intimidated fast bowlers not to drop short, even when they were among the quickest in the history of fast bowling. Inzi, de Silva and Ponting didn't stare back, but kept hooking and pulling merrily. That stare is the one that makes Viv unique.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Its Sobers Vs Sachin Vs Hobbs.

Viv slightly below these 3, as most people select Sobers above Viv as the best WI batsman.
I have never seen anyone rate Sobers or Sachin above Viv

Happy to be proven wrong

Viv was the most dominant I have ever seen
 

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
I have never seen anyone rate Sobers or Sachin above Viv

Happy to be proven wrong

Viv was the most dominant I have ever seen
I have never seen anyone rate Sobers or Sachin above Viv

Happy to be proven wrong

Viv was the most dominant I have ever seen
When cricinfo conducted " Best after Bradman " 2 out of 5 jury members selected Sachin, 2 Sobers ( Crowe selected Sobers after short listing best of every generation and Gavaskar was the best of 70s and 80s) , 1 Hobbs.

Also, Most CW members will go for Sobers ahead of Viv.. I think.
 

Coronis

International Coach
I have never seen anyone rate Sobers or Sachin above Viv

Happy to be proven wrong

Viv was the most dominant I have ever seen

for a more detailed breakdown of how many people voted Tendulkar and Sobers above Viv:

 

CricAddict

Cricketer Of The Year

for a more detailed breakdown of how many people voted Tendulkar and Sobers above Viv:

Actually, he didn't have to go outside this very thread to find one. 24 have voted for Sachin over Viv.
 

Top