why was i banned?

[Son Of Coco]

it does to me. i was banned for a month ! and i didnt even mention lesbian cricketers or refer to them in any way.
it was entirely spiteful and i discovered that there arent any other cricket forums so i couldnt share my thoughts on ben stokes or steve smith or whoever,
it was a frustrating month. ( i was quite lonely)

At least you had plenty of photos of lesbian cricketers to look at.

 

[TheJediBrah]

My apologies. I didn't mean to objectify pigeons. I'll rephrase the question in another way - Have you ever interacted with a pigeon in a consensual way that conveyed your social dependence on each other in a co-habitational situation without enslaving the pigeon under some form of 'ownership' status?

Your avoidance of the first question in my original post is both noted and taken as a damning embracement of the 'the Holocaust was a hoax' line of thought.

I have nothing but love and respect for the Jewish people, my parents had an apartment in the upper-westside as a kid a few blocks from Zabars and I spent many a holiday enjoying the delicacies.

I also watched a lot of South Park though

 

[davado]

ashleigh gardner is my favourite. She's gorgeous. And a great cricketer. Does anyone else think being banned for admiring lesbian cricketers is bigotry?
i do. its 2022 for gods sake not the 1800s

 

[Number 11]

Crying this hard about a forum ban? Might want to reconsider your life champ

 

[davado]

Crying this hard about a forum ban? Might want to reconsider your life champ

my life is quite dull
Hence me being here in the first place.
i doubt reconsidering my life will change it,number, but thanks for the tip

 

[Shady Slim]

ashleigh gardner is my favourite. She's gorgeous. And a great cricketer. Does anyone else think being banned for admiring lesbian cricketers is bigotry?
i do. its 2022 for gods sake not the 1800sView attachment 32863

my brother, to engage with you for a second rather than mock you like a lot of other posters have -

this is a consensual community on this site, and there's a very heavy chance where if you go out of your way to engage in conduct that puts a lot of others here offside you're likely to be made to sit on the sideline, because we're a community here. you're back here after a ban now and you do have the chance here, to start again, come in and join the discussion in a way that won't go against the ire of community standards which have come down against you in the past right? i expect that you may be looking at another ban if you continue to rage against how the community feels - so if you want to stick around, cmon brother, it's clear that line of posting isn't going to pass muster

 

[davado]

good. She can ban me again then. i didnt do anything wrong on either occasion.
i wont be turned into a forum ****old like the weasels who thank ban announements.
it just wont happen.
i think this forum needs a rational, objective moderator not personality policing. Which is what you get now
or everyone will be too scared to post in the mccarthyism regme.
Which is a shame

 

[Son Of Coco]

my brother, to engage with you for a second rather than mock you like a lot of other posters have -

this is a consensual community on this site, and there's a very heavy chance where if you go out of your way to engage in conduct that puts a lot of others here offside you're likely to be made to sit on the sideline, because we're a community here. you're back here after a ban now and you do have the chance here, to start again, come in and join the discussion in a way that won't go against the ire of community standards which have come down against you in the past right? i expect that you may be looking at another ban if you continue to rage against how the community feels - so if you want to stick around, cmon brother, it's clear that line of posting isn't going to pass muster

**** off halfwit!

 

[Daemon]

This is the equivalent of watson turning around and saying you’re the racist ones

 

[Athlai]

good. She can ban me again then. i didnt do anything wrong on either occasion.
i wont be turned into a forum ****old like the weasels who thank ban announements.
it just wont happen.
i think this forum needs a rational, objective moderator not personality policing. Which is what you get now
or everyone will be too scared to post in the mccarthyism regme.
Which is a shame

 

[Adders]

Shady has put it to you as nicely and reasonably as possible......I certainly couldn't be arsed with that effort. If you want to post here, pull your head in.....otherwise just **** off. It's realy quite simple.

Btw, it was your comments on Shane Warne that highlighted you as a complete ****wit ftr

 

[TheJediBrah]

good. She can ban me again then. i didnt do anything wrong on either occasion.
i wont be turned into a forum ****old like the weasels who thank ban announements.
it just wont happen.
i think this forum needs a rational, objective moderator not personality policing. Which is what you get now
or everyone will be too scared to post in the mccarthyism regme.
Which is a shame

Davado 2024

Make Cricket Chat Great Again

 

[davado]

fair enough then. ive vented my spleen. im happy. i have nothing else to say on the subject
if that means i get banned then this is obviously not the place for me

 

[Athlai]

 

[SteveNZ]

I'd have to be presented with an incredibly passionate and considered argument as to the relevance of the ***uality or legal behaviours behind closed doors of any cricketer for me to think it was worth a mention at any time, let alone on a cricket forum.

The sooner this world stops giving a **** about who anyone is attracted to, will be a fine day.

 

[Number 11]

my brother, to engage with you for a second rather than mock you like a lot of other posters have -

this is a consensual community on this site, and there's a very heavy chance where if you go out of your way to engage in conduct that puts a lot of others here offside you're likely to be made to sit on the sideline, because we're a community here. you're back here after a ban now and you do have the chance here, to start again, come in and join the discussion in a way that won't go against the ire of community standards which have come down against you in the past right? i expect that you may be looking at another ban if you continue to rage against how the community feels - so if you want to stick around, cmon brother, it's clear that line of posting isn't going to pass muster

To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand creeping on women

 

[TheJediBrah]

The sooner this world stops giving a **** about who anyone is attracted to, will be a fine day.

Funny thing, I bet people on both extreme ends of the political spectrum will agree with this

 

[Shady Slim]

Funny thing, I bet people on both extreme ends of the political spectrum will agree with this

decidedly untrue given the extreme right wing in most western countries isn't pure libertarian rather religious ethnostatist

 

[TheJediBrah]

decidedly untrue given the extreme right wing in most western countries isn't pure libertarian rather religious ethnostatist

Don't try to confuse me with made up words

 

[HeathDavisSpeed]

I'd have to be presented with an incredibly passionate and considered argument as to the relevance of the ***uality or legal behaviours behind closed doors of any cricketer for me to think it was worth a mention at any time, let alone on a cricket forum.

The sooner this world stops giving a **** about who anyone is attracted to, will be a fine day.

More and more I find that I don't need to post as SteveNZ has already articulated my thoughts in a much more mature, friendly and succinct manner. I think I owe you a pint or two.