Ferris, Turner and Peel played in the same era of Lohmann's. Turner and Peel averaged 50% more. Its like a comparison between Marshall and Srinath.Lohmann 10.75, 6.22
JJ Ferris 12.70, 6.78
Barnes 16.43, 7
Turner 16.53, 5.94
Peel 16.98, 5.05
Its no coincidence either that they all played in an era when a great batsman averaged 35-40. Not at all comparable to Bradman.
Nah he was pretty good imo.Donald Bradman's average
This fella is definitely a contender.Hakuho is as close as anyone to a Bradman-esque record. Not just the greatest sumo wrestler ever, but by a huge margin: 45 championships compared to the next-best with 32 (and this in a sport with some sort of statistics going back 100 years further than test cricket), more wins than anyone ever, longest career as yokozuna ever.
The Washington Post reported on his retirement: "The greatest figure in sports, maybe ever, just retired."
View attachment 32789
Respectfully, **** no.Hulk Hogan a possible outlier if we're including professional wrestling
Yes. Also, Apollo Creed is clearly the best boxer of all time.Hulk Hogan a possible outlier if we're including professional wrestling
This is grossly wrong. First the methodology is wrong. They have taken standard deviation of batting averages, where the distribution is Poisson. Secondly even with this, Jahangir Khan's rally of 554 wins is a much bigger outlier. There was a Australian female squash player who had equally or more bad ass outlier properties than Khan.I've looked for examples in other sports as well, to compare. There is nothing like Don Bradman, when it comes to statistical outliers I'm aware of. Not Babe Ruth, not Pele, not Wilt or Russell. He's a standard deviation, in statistical performance, above all of them as well, and one of a kind in modern sporting history. So the answer to OP, is no.
For each activity analyzed in each sport studied the main results were the Z-score and performance ratio of the rank 1 performer. .
Actually cricket became a world level competition only after India joined in. Then it creating a player pool in from 25% of global population, compared to less than 5% before that.Level of competition is much lower in Squash. Same thing with cricket: you got 4-5 countries playing it it decent level. It was even lower back in the day.
if squash was popular worldwide like Soccer for example, I doubt we would have seen similar dominance like Jahangir Khan or Heather McKay.
For similar reasons, cross-sport comparison is fool’s errand. You can only compare two sports that have similar level of popularity and hence number of people interested in competing.
India has population but very poor training infrastructure compared to developed countries. That’s part of the reason, they have started producing quality pace bowlers only recently.Actually cricket became a world level competition only after India joined in. Then it creating a player pool in from 25% of global population, compared to less than 5% before that.
Pace bowling is only one aspect of cricket. They produce batsmen and spinners at a rate others cannot match.India has population but very poor training infrastructure compared to developed countries. That’s part of the reason, they have started producing quality pace bowlers only recently.
Total batsmen or quality batsmen?Pace bowling is only one aspect of cricket. They produce batsmen and spinners at a rate others cannot match.
Not really tbh. Gretzky average wise, isn't that far ahead of Gordie Howe or Mario Lemieux. Bradman I'd twice as good as what a great batsman averages. That's nuts.Isn’t Wayne Gretzky the closest someone is to being as much of an outlier in their sport as Bradman is in his?