Lee was good, but amongst just Aussies I'd put Bracken and Starc ahead.McGrath
Muralitharan
Akram
Garner
Lee
Those are my top 5.
WC finals in particular. Semi finals also of some relevance though not as much. All other ODIs though, no good.That`s incorrect. Burgey never claimed that.
He claims only WC ODI finals matter.
Well that's pretty much WC finals and semi finals for the most part, isn't it?FTFY
True.WC finals in particular. Semi finals also of some relevance though not as much. All other ODIs though, no good.
And as always I'm correct.
I know WC finals aren't as important as the legendary bilateral Singer Sewing Machine seven match ODI Cups of the mid-1990s held in Sharjah and dominated by Chokedulkar, but for many pf us, they're still right up there.
How many boundaries did he concede?True.
2019 World Cup final
Colin De Grandhomme, 10 overs, 2 maidens, 1 for 25 against the fastest scoring white ball cricket team of all time in the easiest white ball batting era of all time. The big man is a great man.
Exactly. That's an ODI performance of some importance. If he took 7/15 in a JAMODI would anyone care? Of course not. It's why Kohli is a fraud in ODIs - check his record in WC KOs. Honestly, you'd back a third grader parachuted in on an hour's notice to perform at the level he has when it actually matters.True.
2019 World Cup final
Colin De Grandhomme, 10 overs, 2 maidens, 1 for 25 against the fastest scoring white ball cricket team of all time in the easiest white ball batting era of all time. The big man is a great man.
Not particularly close is a huge exaggeration. Actually top five are very close to each other. Each has unique capabilities throughout their careers. McGrath was miserly. Murali was a middle overs wicket taker. Akram was the original death bowler. Garner literally never had been taken apart, and Lee was a wickets machine. All have unique capabilities.McGrath and it's not particularly close.
Might be selling Garner short* though, never saw him he could be a challenger.
*no pun intended
I agree with your top 3 - but not the order.Top 5
Akram
Garner
Mcgrath
Donald
Starc
Lee is massively over rated as an ODI bowler tbh. He regularly got tapped in the last ten overs of an innings. There's a reason Shaun Tait was a more than adequate replacement for him in the 2007 WC.Not particularly close is a huge exaggeration. Actually top five are very close to each other. Each has unique capabilities throughout their careers. McGrath was miserly. Murali was a middle overs wicket taker. Akram was the original death bowler. Garner literally never had been taken apart, and Lee was a wickets machine. All have unique capabilities.
Not sure what you mean by this? But 3 sixes in one over is quite a spanking by 1980s standards. Garner literally never had been taken apart, and .
i agree with mcgrath but starc from aus alone is close. damn near instant win button for 2 world cups in the power batting era.McGrath and it's not particularly close.
Might be selling Garner short* though, never saw him he could be a challenger.
*no pun intended
... and despite that 'spanking' he still had an outstanding ER.Not sure what you mean by this? But 3 sixes in one over is quite a spanking by 1980s standards
Even Saqlain doesn't agree with this. So I will pass.Top 5
Akram
Garner
Mcgrath
Donald
Starc
Murali - not even the best spinner.
Saqlain ?
The important thing is he took wickets, a **** load of it.Lee is massively over rated as an ODI bowler tbh. He regularly got tapped in the last ten overs of an innings. There's a reason Shaun Tait was a more than adequate replacement for him in the 2007 WC.