• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ravi Bopara

Chubb

International Regular
Many thought Ravi would be what Moeen Ali became, the headline British Asian player. Not sure his lack of success in International cricket was because he didn’t work hard enough or anything like that, he may have just been in that space between a good first class player and an international regular. And eventually when England didn’t work out he focused on earning one day and t20 money and you can’t really blame him for that.
 

sledger

Spanish_Vicente
I always liked Ravi but he was one of the (many) players England have experimented with over the years who self-evidently was not of an international standard
 

Bijed

International Regular
>"all-time" XI
>every single player debuted between 1985 and 2011
Tbf I can sort of imagine that if you're someone who plays a sport to a very high standard (or, in this case, if you're Ravi Bopara :ph34r:), contemporary players who are genuinely ATG or near to might leave just that much more of an impression on you
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Tbf I can sort of imagine that if you're someone who plays a sport to a very high standard (or, in this case, if you're Ravi Bopara :ph34r:), contemporary players who are genuinely ATG or near to might leave just that much more of an impression on you
Yeah I think that's fine, but you shouldn't call it an all-time XI if that's what you're doing.
 

Bijed

International Regular
Yeah I think that's fine, but you shouldn't call it an all-time XI if that's what you're doing.
I was meaning more that he genuinely considers it at All-Time XI, it's that he's strongly and presumably unconciously biased towards players he's seen/played with and so has picked a team of 11 gun players that he's seen a lot of without realising that's what he's doing.

That said, it's still hard to square the lack of Bradman in the side, but I'm also wondering if the question was put to him as more of an "Eleven players you'd love to see play together" sort of thing.

I'm also wondering why I'm devoting so much time to this
 

Chubb

International Regular
I always liked Ravi but he was one of the (many) players England have experimented with over the years who self-evidently was not of an international standard
I don't think it was self-evident. He played some excellent innings in one day internationals early in his career. The three test tons have been written off, rightly given the context of that series, but he wasn't really exposed until the 2009 Ashes and that wasn't a great series for batting for anyone. They tried him, it went well for a while and then he got worked out and wasn't good enough, but it wasn't like he came into the side and looked like he was never going to buy a run. It happens for many, many players from all nations.
 

Top