• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Cricket stuff that doesn't deserve its own thread

cnerd123

likes this
Haha "doesn't deserve its own thread" literally huge changes to the sport
there should probably be a single 'Laws of Cricket' thread. I don't think every revision to the Laws needs it's own thread, it happens each year and most of them are pretty minor.
 

Shady Slim

International Coach
While not a particularly difficult thing to umpire, I understand the desire to simplify the law across all levels of cricket. Whether or not a batter crossed can cause some unnecessary conflicts and drama at grassroots levels, where you don't have qualified umpires and plenty of beginners on the field.

However I think they've gotten it backwards. I would have preferred if they defaulted to the non striker immediately taking strike after a catch. That way you always get the 'better' batsman facing the ball right after a wicket, thereby eliminating the need for batsmen to cross in the first place, while also improving the standard of cricket across-the-board.

But having said that, we can't have one law for T20s and another for Tests, and it would be bizarre if the non striker takes strike immediately after an edge behind. So i suppose this is the common sense compromise.

Didn't really feel like a rule that needed changing tho. Feels like they've taken out of those little 1 percenter things that gives you an edge over your opponents if you are alert and understand the rules well enough.
this implies that it’s desirable for tail enders to bat less

see to my mind one of the better things about cricket is when tailenders are thrown on the park to impact the game with their non dominant skill, and it’s much more entertaining than giving teams trying to set big totals easy outs to get batsmen on strike easily
 

cnerd123

likes this
this implies that it’s desirable for tail enders to bat less

see to my mind one of the better things about cricket is when tailenders are thrown on the park to impact the game with their non dominant skill, and it’s much more entertaining than giving teams trying to set big totals easy outs to get batsmen on strike easily
I feel the same but only for Tests. For limited overs cricket it's kinda pointless most of the time. You'd rather have good batting vs good bowling as much as possible throughout the game.
 

Shady Slim

International Coach
I feel the same but only for Tests. For limited overs cricket it's kinda pointless most of the time. You'd rather have good batting vs good bowling as much as possible throughout the game.
while i get ur point to my mind boundaries are cheap enough in LO games as it is with the ropes brought in twenty metres and such and such, last thing i would like is easier empty calorie sixes for the batting team
 

cnerd123

likes this
Women's World Cup, SL tour of India, Aus tour of Pakistan, Ranji Trophy, Afghanistan tour of BD and ICC World Cricket League 2 will all be running simultaneously tomorrow.

This is incredibly inconsiderate to those of us who want to watch all of it.
And again! India vs SL and Pak vs Aus 2nd tests both start tomorrow, albeit with 3.5 hours between the start times.

This is intentional. Whoever is setting the schedules clearly wanted to split the audience.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
And again! India vs SL and Pak vs Aus 2nd tests both start tomorrow, albeit with 3.5 hours between the start times.

This is intentional. Whoever is setting the schedules clearly wanted to split the audience.

Its easy enough to see which dates were first announced.
 

Top