Flem274*
123/5
Cricinfo are full of it. It's probably a 250-400 range deck.Suggestions on cricinfo were that this is a pitch now where SA would score 400+ in their second innings.
Cricinfo are full of it. It's probably a 250-400 range deck.Suggestions on cricinfo were that this is a pitch now where SA would score 400+ in their second innings.
Crazy how these situations happen.He's done a Boland and is surely undroppable after this, at least for the next Test.
Not as bad as our test in Pakistan in 2002.It won't be as bad as this defeat statistically but this defeat is much worse. This is like Zimbabwe in 2005 against New Zealand.
The point is that the SA selection policy is never proactive. Especially with batters. Although the fact that there always seems to be an international quality seamer hanging about helps them with regard to the bowling.Never seen Erwee play but he is 33 this year and has scored 10 hundreds in 14 years. What's the point?
no idea what this autocorrected from.Elgar still strong gales overseas.
Even with new selectors. That's what's so frustrating, that they keep on doing the same thing that the old bunch were doing.The point is that the SA selection policy is never proactive. Especially with batters.
Dropping him down to three might have helped his cause a bit if our openers had decided to do their job.@StephenZA I think us SA supporters know the truth about this side. Markram was our batting hope but I think time hard hands might be a part of his game he can't get rid of. What's the solution? Try to hide him down at 5? How do they do that without dropping him first.
dittoYikes not what you want to wake up to