Yes'ntWas it decided not to include Barnes for this, or did it just degenerate into "he was a spinner/no he wasn't" without ever actually arriving at a conclusion?
We should let Bert Strudwick decide as he would have seen both SF Barnes and O’Reilly bowl....Was it decided not to include Barnes for this, or did it just degenerate into "he was a spinner/no he wasn't" without ever actually arriving at a conclusion?
Sidney Barnes was the best of the medium-pace bowlers in my day, but the Australian W. J. O'Reilly followed him pretty closely.
Wtf kind of logic is thismost people will vote Ambrose so
Ambrose
I think chances are most people will vote Ambrose but there will be plenty of Lillees too. I don't think enough will vote Steyn so no point wasting a vote there. I think Steyn > Ambrose > Lillee.Wtf kind of logic is this
Steyn won the poll Steyn vs Ambrose 2-3 years back iirc.I think chances are most people will vote Ambrose but there will be plenty of Lillees too. I don't think enough will vote Steyn so no point wasting a vote there. I think Steyn > Ambrose > Lillee.
Now that I've said this obviously nothing of the sort will happen.