ataraxia
International Coach
Yeah, I know. Does include minnow-bashing of SA and NZ. Plus he didn't like it.Hammond averaged nearly 75 at 3.
Yeah, I know. Does include minnow-bashing of SA and NZ. Plus he didn't like it.Hammond averaged nearly 75 at 3.
He pretty much averaged over 50 against Australia.From 1932(from O’Reillys debut) to 1938 ,Hammond averaged 49 against Australia including 55 in Australia.the Indias bowling attack wasnt that bad with neser and Amar Singh being pretty good bowler.And the wis attack he got was pretty good as well.Not a big Hammond fan personally. Piled up a heap of runs against weak pace attacks on flat decks. Makes for some grim reading.
Is this a typo or did India really have a bowler called Neserthe Indias bowling attack wasnt that bad with neser and Amar Singh being pretty good bowler.
Nissar*.Mohammad Nissar.Is this a typo or did India really have a bowler called Neser
NissarIs this a typo or did India really have a bowler called Neser
I have Greg Chappell over Smith. I dont think we should include current cricketers, especially someone like Smith who has maybe 30-40 percent of his career ahead of him still, injuries notwithstanding.If we can assume that all of Hammond, Lara and Smith will make it, that would be the ideal line up with Kallis at 6, but while that's likely, there's always that chance that it's not.
Smith >> Chapell because Smith has played for roughly the same duration without avoiding tough tours. I'd have Border over both though.I have Greg Chappell over Smith. I dont think we should include current cricketers, especially someone like Smith who has maybe 30-40 percent of his career ahead of him still, injuries notwithstanding.
Chappell played for 15 years though.Smith >> Chapell because Smith has played for roughly the same duration without avoiding tough tours. I'd have Border over both though.
Chapell effectively played 12 years and never played in India. After a certain point, he gave up touring altogether. Smith has played a decade already and averages much more with a much more creditable away record. Border had an insanely long career and excelled everywhere, even in India. Less ***y but more impressive record IMO. Chapell only played 87 tests to Border's 150+ on the trot. 150 tests in a row. That's insane. Even without the context of shouldering a Root-esque load. Smith has had a better peak and even if he ends up averaging 57 or something he'd still be ahead of Chapell based on his achievements.Chappell played for 15 years though.
Smith has been averaging sub-40 the last 13 tests. What happens if his slump continues? How can you be certain he will rank ahead of Chappell by the end of his career?
Or alternatively, he could have another super peak and kick out someone in the first XI.
I prefer judging cricketers over their entire career. Too many variables.
And Chappell over Border IMO.
imo he and Harris should both be dumped.Smith has been averaging sub-40 the last 13 tests.