Yeah I'd drop him for Iyer. I know Indian posters have been Iyer-skeptical but he's shown he can take on world class bowlers on home decks. I'm aware he has technicial flaws but you can hide him at #6 or #5 while you sand off the edges. With the major 3 deciding to all be bad at once I think India's hand has been forced.Rahane is not several levels above our tailenders at the moment
I think Shri’s clarified that by more bounce he means enough for the spinners to really be in business, but not enough that the quicks will be that much more dangerous. Mumbai more of a classic turner than this one. Yes it may bring NZ’s spinners into the game, but (especially having watched the England series earlier in the year), it very rarely backfires on India; Pune 2017 the exception and possibly the template- need an innings like Smith’s and a bowling effort like O’Keefe’s.Kohli, Pujara and Rahane are several levels above all those other batsmen you've named, and I've seen all except Bharat play. Mayank and Gill will only be more exposed by more pace and bounce because big gates and angled bats are suicide.
Shreyas on a bouncier deck sounds good. NZ can finally hit him in the face.
NZ will be absolutely frothing for more pace and bounce in the deck. Why do you think India fail in NZ? Stylistically NZ are a middle ground between Australia and England. The Kanpur deck was almost perfect, because it exacerbated the difference between the two spinner sets and negated the height and movement of Southee and KJ as much as possible. You want to wheel one of these out again. It almost worked.
Really fast turn just brings everyone into the game, like a green deck in SENA against Sri Lanka (sorry Sri Lanka).
NZ get that same pitch too. India came very close to being screwed by two pace bowlers on this slow grubber. Ajaz's MO is troll breaks wicket to wicket, so if he's got the rust from his system a more bowling friendly deck will just exacerbate the middle order issues both these sides are grappling with.
Bouncing. If it is a sandpit like this game, we can lose test matches if we lose the toss like we did vs england.Point stands. Think about it, when hosting a SENA side, do you want the ball grubbing or bouncing?
Not the one that I rememberHey buddy we gave you the T20s.
Why am I getting Gabba vibe from Indian fans ? Why are we not pessimistic ?all square going to mumbai, good save new zealand!
We will lose when panauti loses the tossNZ will have a great chance to steal the series if we produce a rank turner. Has backfired so many times. Just make a completely depressing road to blunt Southee and Jamieson. Classic SC pitch which starts out a 500 pitch and becomes a 150 pitch on day 4 is what we need. Not his slow uneven bounce non deteriorating nonsense.
Would have lost this test if Panauti was captain.We will lose when panauti loses the toss
Wasn't this the sort of surface used for the first Chennai test of the England series, when Root batted India out of the game? Though IIRC the selection of Shabaz hurt India badly, don't expect either of the two left armers in the current side to be taken apart like he was.Classic SC pitch which starts out a 500 pitch and becomes a 150 pitch on day 4 is what we need.
If its a pitch that begins deteriorating day 2 itself then yeah. If we get a standard old school India pitch where its great till day3/halfway through day 4 and then crumbles, then the team which gets a big first innings lead in good conditions wins. Its those kind of pitches where we've won a ****ton of tests.We will lose when panauti loses the toss