• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official New Zealand in India Nov-Dec 2021 Thread***

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Never been the case for wicketkeepers until recently.

Hey I just thought how NZ could have solved the bowling lineup conundrum - select five bowlers, leave Blundell out but sub him back in to keep wicket for the entire match.
Did not realize every point of yours was the same as your username. Like I said, the salt is magnificent.

Guy has a sprained neck and still battles hard to make 50. You guys are up and down coz he got a substitute keeper. Lol.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
It's cynical tactics, quite blatant.

Was always going to happen when the ICC changed the rules, but that doesn't mean we can't criticise it.
So why the **** should a batsman get a substitute fielder, say a specialist slip fielder or a short leg fielder who gets replaced by the same specialist fielder all game but the injured guy can bat, and yet same can't happen for a keeper. The only ones being cynical here are a couple of NZ supporters. FWIW, Saha is a far better keeper than anyone else in India and trust me, none of our bowlers would want Saha to not keep if he could.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's cynical tactics, quite blatant.

Was always going to happen when the ICC changed the rules, but that doesn't mean we can't criticise it.
It doesnt really make sense though. Saha is a great keeper and a Bharath is seen as a better batsman at the moment. If India really wanted to game the system they're doing a **** job of it and giving NZ an advantage.
 

TheBrand

First Class Debutant
So why the **** should a batsman get a substitute fielder, say a specialist slip fielder or a short leg fielder who gets replaced by the same specialist fielder all game but the injured guy can bat, and yet same can't happen for a keeper. The only ones being cynical here are a couple of NZ supporters. FWIW, Saha is a far better keeper than anyone else in India and trust me, none of our bowlers would want Saha to not keep if he could.
Because Saha is literally as fresh as a daisy when he bats. Injury notwithstanding.
 

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
It doesnt really make sense though. Saha is a great keeper and a Bharath is seen as a better batsman at the moment. If India really wanted to game the system they're doing a **** job of it and giving NZ an advantage.
Fair, it likely wasn't India's intention and for the most part I was just having a lend. It's still slightly off that Saha doesn't have to do the hours of hard work keeping either side of run-scoring, but meh... though I can now see how a team might properly abuse this in future if they want to.
 

SteveNZ

Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah I mean there has been no batsmen ever who have needed subs for fielding but batted coz of injury in the history of cricket. Lol.
Thats not particularly relevant.

And even then, has a player had a sub fielder twice, sandwiched around an innings? It's a massive piss take. I don't really care, he's a bog average batsman and the reserve keeper isn't better than him. But if he has an injury so bad that he can't keep twice, that's not in keeping with being able to bat for hours on end.

It has nothing to do with whether we lose or win. But it's a bit of a joke
 

Top