• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Question on ban announcements

GoodAreasShane

Cricketer Of The Year
Lets not believe for a single second that a certain members posting was anything more than an attempt at picking a fight. Him feeling the need to get so directly personal thereafter makes it clear that whole line of posting was always in bad faith

From literally anyone else I would think differently, but this pelican in question knew full well he was being deliberately inflammatory
 

grecian

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Lets not believe for a single second that a certain members posting was anything more than an attempt at picking a fight. Him feeling the need to get so directly personal thereafter makes it clear that whole line of posting was always in bad faith

From literally anyone else I would think differently, but this pelican in question knew full well he was being deliberately inflammatory
This I guess is the mob mentality, or are you speaking about Sledger, as that whom the ban pertains to, and surely is the only person we should be discussing here?

If the other person gets banned, maybe we can chat about this mythical being you are having a pop at.
 

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Basically nationalistic jingoists roleplaying as mods who contribute even less than Dan are responsible for sledger's demise.
 

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I know no one asked my opinion but I'll give it anyway even if it adds nothing new. It really was a terrible post and my response in the thread was less joking and more 'wtf'. Like, who was it even trolling? Noumenon or whatever isn't even Pakistani, so was it meant to piss off trundler or me and.. I don't even know who else is left from Pak fan perspective but I guess Fusion? It was really tone deaf in a thread where everyone was already bagging on Pakistani fans based on reactions from PCB, ex-players, and ****ing PakPassion. Kick me while I'm down yeah? I know he went back and made the edit, but it was many hours later, everyone had already seen it and reported it, and I had gone back to it multiple times wondering wtf he was thinking.

I will echo what some of the others have said. The verbiage used by sledger here and in the past is very much representative of some of the racial abuse I've certainly put up with in my time here in the states. That uppity nose-in-the-air attitude while talking about my motherland certainly reminds me of all the times I told someone where I'm from and be greeted by "well at least you're honest" (yeah its funny but feels like ****). But I want to be clear in saying that not once did I think sledger is racist or had that intention. Just like Uppercut said in a post earlier, I always assumed he just didn't realize the impact words like that have. My biggest regret up to now is not reaching out to sledger directly and having a chat with him, which is precisely what I meant to do after he made that "corrupt culture" post but unfortunately life got in the way and I forgot all about it.

In any case, I really don't see anyone wanting to go back on the ban, and the whole situation sucks because it feels odd having him banned on not telling us how things are going with sledger jnr.

Also, cut trundloo a break you ****s. He is an athiest kid in Pakistan in a town that just moved past tanga buggies :ph34r: . This whole thing is way more personal for him than all of you.
So you chose to be offended by another post, forgot your choice to be offended and then remembered your choice to be offended and doubled down on another post.
 

Shri

Mr. Glass
Lets not believe for a single second that a certain members posting was anything more than an attempt at picking a fight. Him feeling the need to get so directly personal thereafter makes it clear that whole line of posting was always in bad faith

From literally anyone else I would think differently, but this pelican in question knew full well he was being deliberately inflammatory
dude shut the **** up
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Lets not believe for a single second that a certain members posting was anything more than an attempt at picking a fight. Him feeling the need to get so directly personal thereafter makes it clear that whole line of posting was always in bad faith

From literally anyone else I would think differently, but this pelican in question knew full well he was being deliberately inflammatory
The only one picking a fight here is you. Trundler has an actual grievance so it's understandable why he's pissed. You're in here butting into the thread having a go at him to continue your lame feud. Its pathetic.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The only one picking a fight here is you. Trundler has an actual grievance so it's understandable why he's pissed. You're in here butting into the thread having a go at him to continue your lame feud. Its pathetic.
It's very interesting when someone, who has been informed (by myself) how to use the ignore function, chooses not to use it and instead insists on continually complaining about the poster they dislike when the rest of us don't seem to have a problem with them.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Using the ignore function is lame AF. You deprive yourself of the opportunity to rip in if you can't see what any given imbo is posting. Using it is as bad as reporting posts directed at yourself. Fire up and have a crack back, or just ignore it rather than the poster overall.

And if there's an ignore function, it should also be able to apply selectively across different threads or subfora. For example, HB is a reasonably decent (if ridiculously over sensitive when it suits him) fella and not bad value in OT, but he has no clue at all about cricket and, like many others, if I could put his posts in CC on ignore the experience would plainly be better. Same with Cribb and GIMH in the politics subbie. It's not that they're odious, it's that they're ignorant, misguided fools. I don't want to ignore them per se, just their idiotic ramblings about dickertarianism.
 
Last edited:

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Using the ignore function is lame AF. You deprive yourself of the opportunity to rip in if you can't see what any given imbo is posting. Using it is as bad as reporting posts directed at yourself. Fire up and have a crack back, or just ignore it rather than the poster overall.

And if there's an ignore function, it should also be able to apply selectively across different threads or subfora. For example, HB is a reasonably decent (if ridiculously over sensitive when it suits him) fella and not bad value in OT, but he has no clue at all about cricket and, like many others, if I could put his posts in CC on ignore the experience would plainly be better. Same with Cribb and GIMH in the politics subbie. It's not that they're odious, it's that they're ignorant, misguided fools. I don't want to ignore them per se, just their idiotic ramblings about dickertarianism.
1632284658405.png
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ooh look at me, I'm so edgy, supporting a philosophy based on the not at all orthodox notion of (checks notes)...... capitalism
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Ooh look at me, I'm so edgy, supporting a philosophy based on the not at all orthodox notion of (checks notes)...... capitalism
I'll remember this next time I say something libertarian and you try to point out how it'd be considered batshit crazy by the vast majority people. Apparently what I support is totally mainstream!
 

Top