Michaelf7777777
International Debutant
Len Hutton, Bruce Mitchell
George Headley
Jack Cowie, Wally Hammond
Herbie Taylor
George Headley
Jack Cowie, Wally Hammond
Herbie Taylor
Great stuff, but I think you're missing one vote for each of Dempster, Larwood, and Cowie.ongoing votes (have 8 posts so far, expecting at least 3 more min, 5 would be ideal though!)
1920s side captaincy:
Herbie Taylor - 5 votes
Wally Hammond - 3 votes
1930s openers:
Hutton - 7 votes
Mitchell - 3 votes
Ponsford - 2 votes
Sutcliffe - 2 votes
Jardine - 1 vote
Number 3:
Headley - 8 votes
Opening bowlers:
Larwood - 4 votes
Constantine - 2 votes
Martindale - 2 votes
Voce - 2 votes
Bowes - 1 vote
Cowie - 1 vote
Hammond - 1 vote
Tate - 1 vote
The new ball pairing contest is wide open!
That's not really true though, as Bill O'Reilly bowled more googlies than leg breaks I believe.Finally a bit of variety in the votes! A lot of different ideas of what the team should need.
I'm of the opinion we don't need all 3 ATG spinners (they all turn it the same way being a reason), as much as it hurts to omit one
I really don’t understand how from just one series. Yeah, I get it was one of the ATG series but its not like there were no other good pace bowlers that decade. Its like picking Johnson just based on the 2013-14 Ashes.For the bowlers, Larwood is a lock despite not playing after 1933 but I am torn in a bunch of different directions for his new ball partner.
Surely he bats 6 and is first change seamer ahead of Hammond. Two quicks, two (of out 3) spinners, plus McCabe and Hammond.And really, I'm just trying to work out what jiggery pokery I need to perform to somehow get Stan McCabe into this team...
Yeah, that's my thinking - it involves leaving out either Grimmett or Verity (because I'm not leaving out O'Reilly), but that's a sacrifice I might just have to make.Surely he bats 6 and is first change seamer ahead of Hammond. Two quicks, two (of out 3) spinners, plus McCabe and Hammond.
There'll be at least 2 votes that way. I'm also disappointed there's no space for Jardine.Yeah, that's my thinking - it involves leaving out either Grimmett or Verity (because I'm not leaving out O'Reilly), but that's a sacrifice I might just have to make.
All probably moot, as I imagine I'll be the only one voting that way!
No I want McCabe in too. I feel like 3 spinners is overkillYeah, that's my thinking - it involves leaving out either Grimmett or Verity (because I'm not leaving out O'Reilly), but that's a sacrifice I might just have to make.
All probably moot, as I imagine I'll be the only one voting that way!
Grum has a better record than O'Reilly for the decade despite being in his 40s for nigh all of it, don't leave him out.Yeah, that's my thinking - it involves leaving out either Grimmett or Verity (because I'm not leaving out O'Reilly), but that's a sacrifice I might just have to make.
All probably moot, as I imagine I'll be the only one voting that way!
He does, it's true but...well I'll explain my reasoning when the spinner vote comes.Grum has a better record than O'Reilly for the decade despite being in his 40s for nigh all of it, don't leave him out.
That's because Grum decimated the weaker teams. O'Reilly's record against England in the 1930s (102 wickets @ 25) is miles better than Grimmett (59 wickets @ 33).Grum has a better record than O'Reilly for the decade despite being in his 40s for nigh all of it, don't leave him out.