• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Bangladesh Tour of New Zealand

cnerd123

cnerd123

likes this
slippy888 said:
What happen with the new zealand players i am not watching
Click to expand...
they're cheating and hurling balls at batters to intimidate them, that's what

the match is live on youtube, do tune in,

BeeGee said:
That's ridiculous. By that logic anyone who catches the ball on the run and throws it in the air in celebration while still running (which happens all the time) was not in control of the ball and it wasn't a catch.
Click to expand...
Gibbs dropped the world cup in similar fashion
 
K

kaetor

U19 Cricketer
BeeGee said:
That's ridiculous. By that logic anyone who catches the ball on the run and throws it in the air in celebration while still running (which happens all the time) was not in control of the ball and it wasn't a catch.
Click to expand...
To clarify, by moving I mean he's not in control of his movement. E.g he's unable to stop the ball from touching the ground, or from his person going over the boundary.

With the logic we have of just needing to take the catch, Trent Boult's catch in the world cup final should have counted too. He had the ball under control before hitting the boundary.
 
The Hutt Rec

The Hutt Rec

International Vice-Captain
kaetor said:
To clarify, by moving I mean he's not in control of his movement. E.g he's unable to stop the ball from touching the ground, or from his person going over the boundary.

With the logic we have of just needing to take the catch, Trent Boult's catch in the world cup final should have counted too. He had the ball under control before hitting the boundary.
Click to expand...
Well I think we can all get on board with this interpretation.
 
BeeGee

BeeGee

International Captain
kaetor said:
To clarify, by moving I mean he's not in control of his movement. E.g he's unable to stop the ball from touching the ground, or from his person going over the boundary.

With the logic we have of just needing to take the catch, Trent Boult's catch in the world cup final should have counted too. He had the ball under control before hitting the boundary.
Click to expand...
You're comparing apples and oranges. The fielder touching the boundary with ball in hand is always counted as a boundary regardless of what happened before it. If the fielder catches the ball and is perfectly still and in control, therefore has taken the catch, but then runs over the boundary, it would still be a boundary not a catch.

Don't use the boundary to try and justify your position because it's a completely different situation.
 
cnerd123

cnerd123

likes this
comms still going on about that catch. It was clearly a drop. I don't see the controversy. I'm disgusted that Jamieson even tried to claim it.

EDIT: cool they ultimately agree with me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top