Fuller Pilch
Hall of Fame Member
40 years since the most disgraceful event in cricket history
Murray Mints were easier to do surreptitiously.bet this thread goes well
sandpapergate v underarm, which contained less brainpower?
Got half right.One of the great tactical pieces of captaincy, and well within the laws of the game. Quality.
As President Nixon said, "if you use sandpaper on the ball, you can't have a problem with the fellow who uses vaseline."Murray Mints were easier to do surreptitiously.
I believe the order of things were the other way around so perhaps England can shut it. Also love how the butthurt continues for NZ.As President Nixon said, "if you use sandpaper on the ball, you can't have a problem with the fellow who uses vaseline."
It doesn't. Well it does in some circles, mostly journos who think it's interesting. Note to NZ journos: it isn't.I believe the order of things were the other way around so perhaps England can shut it. Also love how the butthurt continues for NZ.
Probably put Sandpaper above ball biting, tbh. Otherwise, decent. And what about Bodyline? Weren't there actual calls for war to be declared against England because of it?Ranking the gates,
1. Match fixing
2. Spot fixing
3. Ball biting
4. Sandpaper gate
5. Under-arm gate
and then we have DRS gate, Monkeygate, homework gate etc etc.
So yeah, that's not the most disgraceful.
Would have been very generous of the fielders to let a ball going 15kph make it to the boundary. Would have had to kick it a long a few times.Imagine if he ****ed up the roll and it went for 5 wides.