I did before it even made the listWe didn't talk about #17.
The balls of the century, No. 17: Mitchell Starc to James Vince
Unpredictable. Unplayable. Unintentional?www.thecricketmonthly.com
cracks/footmarks shouldn't count imo
Probably the most overrated delivery in ages. Im convinced it was another one of those leg side wides from Starc that just happened to hit a massive crack. The thing was going 3 feet down leg.You mean Starc to Vince wasnt the best ball over bowled?!
You gotta say though, more than Sreesanth it was Kallis who made this delivery, he could have stayed still like an idiot and got hit and no one would talk about it.The balls of the century, No. 16: Sreesanth to Jacques Kallis
Immovable object meets irresistible bouncerwww.thecricketmonthly.com
Kallis batted like a God in that series, Sachin not too far behind either.
I get what you're saying and half agree with you. But at the same time Starc said he was trying to hit the cracks so I'm inclined to believe it was a combination of a lot of luck and a bit of skill and planning.I did before it even made the list
Probably the most overrated delivery in ages. Im convinced it was another one of those leg side wides from Starc that just happened to hit a massive crack. The thing was going 3 feet down leg.
I get what you're saying and half agree with you. But at the same time Starc said he was trying to hit the cracks so I'm inclined to believe it was a combination of a lot of luck and a bit of skill and planning.
I thin we can all agree that it looked bloody impressive though.
Fair enough. Still a ***y wicket though."Admittedly I probably wasn't aiming for that crack, because it was a little too straight if it moves [into the right-hander], but yeah, there was a little bit of luck, and fortunately it hit the stumps."
Did he go wider on the crease on purpose, to create a challenging angle?
"No, I always bowl pretty wide on the crease from around the wicket. That wasn't a plan to go any wider."
Oh yeah, made for great entertainment. Vince very unlucky in that he finally managed to cross 30 but ended up getting something unplayable.Fair enough. Still a ***y wicket though.
Did you make this up, like your spreadsheets?"Admittedly I probably wasn't aiming for that crack, because it was a little too straight if it moves [into the right-hander], but yeah, there was a little bit of luck, and fortunately it hit the stumps."
Did he go wider on the crease on purpose, to create a challenging angle?
"No, I always bowl pretty wide on the crease from around the wicket. That wasn't a plan to go any wider."
Those articles are tldr to me. I just skip to the clip.It's in the cricketmonthly link, along with this gem
"It's usually a good strategy to aim for cracks, especially when they're on someones behind"
right off a crack. Just plain probability.It wasnt in a test match but this was probably an even more unplayable version of the Sreesanth bouncer to kallis.
His knees were pretty much entirely cream cheese by age 29You look at some of this stuff from Flintoff and wonder why didn't he pick 350 wickets at 27 or less. He would have legitimately be counted among the greatest all-rounders ever if he could summon his bowling excellence just a bit more often.