Imagine the ECB are making a profit with TV rights etc. There might be missed revenue and an overall annual loss but would imagine the additional costs of hosting this match are being offset by the TV revenue they might not receive in full had they not played.I honestly think the ECB have shown the way. Its whether the other boards are desperate enough to do the same thing.
I do slightly question the Sri Lanka v Bangladesh claim but I can't say I'm too sure on the matter but for West Indies hosting England is the only other series that makes them money outside hosting India. If you are not making money each time you tour other nations and lose money every series you host minus one (if India were to cut ties with West Indies). All that would do is lead to lower player wages/welfare, lure more players overseas and to IPL and leave fans further disillusioned decreasing the value of any domestic TV rights. With 'The Big Three' in the recent past it does worry me a bit that one nation (India) holds so much power and can use such power to effectively have a huge say in cricket's future development (which will be based on their own self-interest, like every other nation not reliant on 1 or 2 nations to tour.)But other teams can and do make profits hosting others, just not to the extent they may with India. Windies could make money hosting England for instance, I am sure Sri Lanka can make money playing Bangladesh perhaps and so on.
NoCan the mods put some colour in the title?
What is worse is that they are not balanced.There are far too many asterisks in the thread title and it's distracting.