We will surely be getting less of Chase bowling...regardless of whether he can destroy England again or not.That's the team right there. Can't see any other combination picked. Picking Reiter ahead of Cornwall would be s big mistake, that's the only other combination I see.
Yeah, in the end, he's done nothing wrong in his career really. First class average of 61 seems alright, Test of 47, it'll do for Number 5 not that big a responsibility anyway is it? I'm not sure that the top 4 is that shaky though, compared to some we've had recently, I mean they can all score Test runs, none are great but none are proven failures either.Pope is gun.
Well we haven't been surprised by that type of score for about 4 years, as I said it is slightly less shaky than what has come before, comparatively. I don't think anyone would describe it as anything other than just-below average,but if root had been out of the side before, it would have been pretty much incredibly poor.they are shaky. burns averages 33, a third of sibley's career runs came in one knock, crawley has a handful of tests for an average of 27 and joe denly averages 30 on the dot with no test tons.
stokes obv a gun and pope is a rising star but i don't think english fans should be surprised if they're 4/20 a lot against the windies. i rate burns and i think denly can do a job, but as a unit they're very wobbly.
fortunately for england the windies have the same problem.
Pope is gun.
He'll be a guy that averages 42 rather than late 40s, we have had 100s worse, but if that's his low point he'll be great.Looked very Ian Bell to me than Joe Root. Make of that what you will.
But with Burns like glue and Denly up for it, can you be wrong?i think it's the weakest english top four i've seen since i began watching cricket
they might bring their A games and go big, but it's a bad time for root to miss a game.
I think it probably comes down to his lack of cricket over the last 9 months or so. Shame because it seems like it would have been a good matchup against the windies right handers.I am surprised at no Leach have to say.
Yet in the end it seems about 3 decades ago, but our last test Series was a success, and this is the nucleus. Perhaps as simple as that, with Root and Curran ruled out, but Archer fit. With no real cricket since to judge on, perhaps sensible.
I think the opposite haha. Bell was really brilliant for a period, though probably not long enough to call it an era.I am not saying Pope is not good, just don't think I would have turned Ian Bell of any era as "gun". I actually think Sam Curran has the potential to be the "gun" player for England.
Wait aren't they both locks?Will the presence of Denly prompt England to play 4 seamers and thus play both Broad and Anderson?
There are 13 in that squad, so there's 3 slots between Anderson, Broad, Archer, Woakes and Wood. But yes, Anderson and Broad are both locks. Quite correctlyWait aren't they both locks?
It's between Wood and Archer for that final slot I believe, unless they don't mind weakening the batting by leaving Woakes out.
I am not sure who is locks really, I can honestly see them rotating in these weird circumstances, I don't really see any of the pace bowlers playing all the test Matches.There are 13 in that squad, so there's 3 slots between Anderson, Broad, Archer, Woakes and Wood. But yes, Anderson and Broad are both locks. Quite correctly