OverratedSanity
Request Your Custom Title Now!
It is offside isn't it? He has to move his foot away from the shot which counts as interfering with play? I think?
Personally think it should have stood.It is offside isn't it? He has to move his foot away from the shot which counts as interfering with play? I think?
Quite correctly in this instance. How is a player sat on his arse directly in front of the keeper not offside?VAR strikes again!
the players? from what i understood taking the players off is a FA/league association decree?The **** is going on in the Bundesliga? Why are rude banners about club owners where the players have decided to draw the line?
More worrying is it seems to be getting more serious treatment than racist chanting.The **** is going on in the Bundesliga? Why are rude banners about club owners where the players have decided to draw the line?
We all know boomers can't handle a bit of criticism.More worrying is it seems to be getting more serious treatment than racist chanting.
I know it's correct in accordance with the rules, but for me when the ball hits Maguire it changes direction and IMHO that should be a new phase of play. Which would of course make his whereabouts irrelevant.Quite correctly in this instance. How is a player sat on his arse directly in front of the keeper not offside?
If you have to move your legs to avoid being hit by the ball, then you're interesting with play.
Strongly disagree with this. I don't think it would improve the game if a slight deflection allowed players to score from positions that were miles offside. But mostly I just react strongly against it because a lot of amateur league teams wrongly think this how the rule stands now and give refs a lot of unwarranted abuse when it comes up.I know it's correct in accordance with the rules, but for me when the ball hits Maguire it changes direction and IMHO that should be a new phase of play. Which would of course make his whereabouts irrelevant.
However, technically VAR got it right. Whether the game really benefits from this sort of thing is another question.
That being said, my only experience with VAR as a fan was away to Watford and it came up trumps for us so can't knock it really.
This is one of those times where VAR has worked exactly as it should have though. It's corrected a clear error.I know it's correct in accordance with the rules, but for me when the ball hits Maguire it changes direction and IMHO that should be a new phase of play. Which would of course make his whereabouts irrelevant.
However, technically VAR got it right. Whether the game really benefits from this sort of thing is another question.
That being said, my only experience with VAR as a fan was away to Watford and it came up trumps for us so can't knock it really.
Sure but for me the whole direction changes when it hits Maguire. It's hardly a slight deflection. But that's just my opinion and it would open up lots of grey I am sure.Strongly disagree with this. I don't think it would improve the game if a slight deflection allowed players to score from positions that were miles offside. But mostly I just react strongly against it because a lot of amateur league teams wrongly think this how the rule stands now and give refs a lot of unwarranted abuse when it comes up.
Sure, but my view is more on whether we need VAR - or whether it improves the sport.This is one of those times where VAR has worked exactly as it should have though. It's corrected a clear error.
But he's offside when the ball is played by his teammate, and doesn't return to a legitimate position at any point before or after the ball hits Maguire.Sure but for me the whole direction changes when it hits Maguire. It's hardly a slight deflection. But that's just my opinion and it would open up lots of grey I am sure.
I did acknowledge this.Yeah, as the offside rule stands the fact the ball hits Maguire is irrelevant.
Who?Liverpool get over the line but doesn't look like they'll turn over athletico in this form