vcs
Request Your Custom Title Now!
They were fairly rubbish IMO. They didn't seem to participate in any of the tri-series cups that were ubiquitous around that time, and they were crap in World Cups as well after '92.I think Englands poorness in ODIs is more of a meme than anything. They were ranked number one as late as 95.
98-2002 is approximately Zims strongest period, and England were still winning nearly twice as much as them.
Team records | One-Day Internationals | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
India were rubbish as well, but they masked their rubbishness by playing so many of those tri-series that they managed to win a few along the way.