Not for a while imo - Keshav has performed better than any other spinner since readmission so I really don't see him getting the sack unless he has an extended and markedly poor run.So Linde has just taken 6, granted it was against the Dolphins but still... wonder when he may start putting real pressure on Maharaj?
Despite this pitch having no demons now it is Pieter Malan's position to lose first.Opener-wise, I'm probably in the minority in my support of giving Janneman a push.
I know he's got his issues but his sheer volume of runs and his conversion rates at such a young age are hugely enticing to me.
I don't see Moore as a long-term 40+-averaging player, whereas Janneman Malan definitiely has that up-side. Moore feels like a good FC player who will be a solid but unspectacular Test batsman.
Now in fairness we could use that in our current context but I'm more inclined to build for the future rather than try bandage current issues.
No, you right - it was his poor start for the Titans. Averages about 45 for the Cobras which is decent.Just wondering about Pieter Malan. I think his franchise average is something like 36, but that's for his whole career, right? He's been scoring runs for the Cobras, so what's his average in recent years?
I'm still don't think he was the best pick for the test side, and his poor record for South Africa A definitely counts against him. But could that 36 be as a result of a very poor start to his career and we're perhaps judging him a bit too harshly? Although I take that all back if his recent average is still in the same ballpark.
Absolutely. That's part of why I'm not convinced he's the best selection. I was just curious as to whether he'd had a bit of a late career resurgence to mean that he wasn't a completely terrible selection either.But I mean you get 5 opportunities for the A side with a highest score of 34 and average 7 there has to be doubts.
100%Absolutely. That's part of why I'm not convinced he's the best selection. I was just curious as to whether he'd had a bit of a late career resurgence to mean that he wasn't a completely terrible selection either.
And to his credit, a 50 as part a 4th innings attempt to save the match after being out cheaply first time around is not to be sniffed at.
Don't think he would get selected at the moment anyways. It is obvious that they want players with decent FC experience. I think the they have mentioned giving the younger guys a chance to prove themselves in the ODI's etc.Wiaan Mulder needs to get fit.
And in the first test Pretorius batted ahead of Philander...The comms were going on about Philander refusing a single in a Bess over that "exposed" Hulk to Stokes. Look, when you are averaging nearly 40 in FC cricket you can't be protected by Philander. If he is there to provide batting then he isn't doing it.
I'll throw into the mix two other names, even though I don't think either of them is ready at the moment.Mulder might be the ideal player that we all have in mind but they aren't going to him any time soon by the looks of it(injuries and lack of games). The other options are:
Phehlukwayo: Who hasn't proved he can bat 7 in FC cricket and isn't as accurate as Hulk imo.
Linde: Bowling is his primary suit and I don't know if he is a Test match number 7. Probably too similar to Kesh as a bowler anyway.
Muthusamy : The best batsman from these three but his bowling was exposed in India. Also similar to Kesh.