• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* England in South Africa 2019/20

Spark

Global Moderator
Broad was noticeably quicker in the Ashes than in recent years IIRC. Would hit 145 at times, which hadn't really been seen since his "enforcer" days.
 

Woodster

International Captain
Really? How hard is it for professional cricketers to not bowl no balls?
So frustrating that they push the line so much! Unplayable delivery but woeful schoolboy error that it seems plenty of bowlers are making these days. Pretty sure they bowl a lot more no-balls these days but because it seems the umpires aren’t really checking the front foot at all until a wicket goes they’re probably getting away with a few but not making the corrections to their run-up as they would do if they were called.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Apparently Broad needs every last bit of pace as is the meme.

He's bowled quicker than I can remember in recent times today.
He is weird, when he clicks he is 6-8 mph quicker but only does it a couple of times a series these days. Such a dangerous streak bowler.
 

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Broad was noticeably quicker in the Ashes than in recent years IIRC. Would hit 145 at times, which hadn't really been seen since his "enforcer" days.
Wait really? Like speed gun 145 or proper looking 145?

And I thought P Siddy rediscovering 140 a few summers back was amazing.
 

Groundking

International Debutant
I still don't understand why the 3rd ump doesn't have a buzzer to buz the onfield umpires whilst checking every ball. Surely this is a better use of them instead of them lounging around for hours on end until there's a review?
 

artvandalay

State Vice-Captain
Yea it looks like the umpires are not even checking the front foot. If that's the case need to do what was done in the India west indies series. Can't only call them when you're checking to see if it's a legitimate ball after a batsman is dismissed.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Wait really? Like speed gun 145 or proper looking 145?

And I thought P Siddy rediscovering 140 a few summers back was amazing.
Speed gun 145 tbf. He did look quicker than usual though, just maybe not that quick.
 

greg

International Debutant
Yup. Apparently we shouldn't expect these guys to do their jobs nowadays.
It's all just bl**dy ridiculous. The attitude just seems to be that the that noballs only matter when a wicket falls. There is no problem with no calling close ones (but the umpire should still make the bowler aware that they are getting close). But the approach taken actually significantly disadvantages the batting team as well. For a start there's all the lost runs. And even more the approach basically gives the quicker bowlers impunity to bowl at increased pace. What happens when they end up causing injuries after bowling 90mph+ deliveries off 21 yards? Sometimes it's tough enough batting anyway without shortening the pitch. The game is about scoring runs as well as taking wickets!
 

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
To be fair re the no balls, Reiffel has an extremely limited field of view thanks to that mammoth beak of his.

As for Dharmasena, what can we expect?
 

greg

International Debutant
I would like to know why the England management aren't communicating the noball situation to the middle. Unless Stokes role in this spell isn't actually to take any wickets.
 

Top