Smith must have been very disappointed in Head, well done for the 100 but only 48 SR. After he had batted at 35 SR and only hit out trying to set up the declaration.lol really? to answer your question: absolutely.
first innings at 2-200 you're always going to play more aggressively and risk gifting wickets that you normally wouldn't, especially if you're as unselfish as Smith
second innings nearly the whole Australian innings was declaration batting, after the openers
Really hope this was the post that got Brah binned........So dire even by his standardsPonting saying what a lot of us were last night, basically "If Aussies are going to declare I'd like to see them do it without throwing their wickets away because NZ don't deserve the wickets"
You just know next time NZ play Aus the kiwi fans are going to say stupid **** like "SmItH iS WaGnEr's BuNnY" because he hit a few catches off him batting to declare. There's no need to gift these guys wickets, just bat normally and declare when you have enough runs. There's no rush.
It wasn't that post but the fact that he had been repeatedly making posts like that definitely made me more likely to think he was just trying to piss people off with his posts in general.Really hope this was the post that got Brah binned........So dire even by his standards
Jono Cook and I thank youIt wasn't that post but the fact that he had been repeatedly making posts like that definitely made me more likely to think he was just trying to piss people off with his posts in general.
Absolutely disgusting post, no surprise you're banned.I tend to agree, but basically you're saying here that Latham's lead should be followed because he was just really lucky. If Blundell played and missed as much as Latham instead of nicking off he might have tonned up.
At the rate he's been taking wickets it probably didn't feel very long.I find it really strange that Cummins didn't know he had gone 70 wickets without a LBW