Which player past or present would you be?

[Jack1]

You take their game, look like you still. You play for your own nation and county/team of choice.

For me Rashid Khan. Afridi was close. Also Michael Holding was close.

 

[Tom Flint]

Lara all day. And I'd choose to stick with playing for the west indies and play 50% of my games in Antigua Jamaica Barbados ect !

 

[Jack1]

Lara all day. And I'd choose to stick with playing for the west indies and play 50% of my games in Antigua Jamaica Barbados ect !

He would be gd more so in tests, Sachin probably edges lara tho for me if i wanted to go for a batter

 

[Shri]

joginder sharma

because...lets be realistic

 

[SillyCowCorner1]

Dwayne Leverock. ..because of that moment.

 

[Burgey]

Joel Garner

 

[Jack1]

Bob Willis is and was a serious troll, taking his game would be alright . Add his style to my list of names

 

[srbhkshk]

Don Bradman. Why do any other options exist.

 

[ataraxia]

Hobbs, W Rhodes, Sobers, Ramadhin, Freeman, and Grimmett are my options. Would love to be a spinner, but Hobbs probably beats the rest. I probably shouldn't pick Hobbs because no Sutcliffe but would partner him with Sutcliffe in county cricket. Probs put him in around 1931 so Hobbs/Dempster and Hobbs/Sutcliffe are two partnerships (assuming you could change the time period). Hobbs/Hutton and Hobbs/B Sutcliffe is enticing too however.

Being Bradman would just be annoying.

 

[Jack1]

Don Bradman. Why do any other options exist.

That dude was too good I bet half the time he sandbagged to give others a chance lol

and btw I reckon Bradman got out on purpose last dig so he didn’t look like an immortal troll, no way he played full tilt all the time with those stats

Hobbs, W Rhodes, Sobers, Ramadhin, Freeman, and Grimmett are my options. Would love to be a spinner, but Hobbs probably beats the rest. I probably shouldn't pick Hobbs because no Sutcliffe but would partner him with Sutcliffe in county cricket. Probs put him in around 1931 so Hobbs/Dempster and Hobbs/Sutcliffe are two partnerships (assuming you could change the time period). Hobbs/Hutton and Hobbs/B Sutcliffe is enticing too however.

Being Bradman would just be annoying.

U might have convinced me with Sutcliffe , definitely in tests but across formats I still prefer khan/afridi/Warne (sneaking in) but everyone’s different so different angles are gd

 

[Bijed]

Don Bradman. Why do any other options exist.

I dunno, if I could be an international standard player I'd probably be a bowler. Just reckon bowling your side to victory would generally feel more awesome than scoring runs

 

[srbhkshk]

I dunno, if I could be an international standard player I'd probably be a bowler. Just reckon bowling your side to victory would generally feel more awesome than scoring runs

I am an Indian, what do you mean by a "bowler"?

 

[a massive zebra]

That dude was too good I bet half the time he sandbagged to give others a chance lol

Jack Hobbs on Don Bradman:

He was too good! He spoilt the game – he got too many runs.

 

[Jack1]

Jack Hobbs probably felt like a number 8 compared to Bradman, mind blowing if u think about it

 

[Red]

Keith Miller or Mark Waugh.

 

[ataraxia]

Miller's a good option. Like Rhodes though he can't average 50 and bowl a lot. Still an incredible player.

 

[Coronis]

Ramprakash or Bevan. I have a lot of potential but when it comes down to it, I just don’t have the right stuff.

 

[Daemon]

Imran Khan

You get to bat, bowl, captain and get all the ladies

 

[JBMAC]

Don Bradman....it's a lay down Mizzare

 

[Gnske]

Leslie Hylton