Normally I'd agree that it's hard to tell, but this one looked different. It really looked pretty clear that it bounced off the ground.Surprised there's confusion about the catch. Thought the general consensus was that it's hard to judge those on tv, but a lot look more not out than they actually are because of the 2D pictures. Either way, those are are pretty much always decided by the soft signal if there's doubt. I think that's a bit of a stupid way of doing things, since a lot of the time the umpires are just guessing, and even probably have their verdict influenced by how the fielders react. But it's just how they do it now. Broad's dismissal in the last Melbourne test was more iffy than this one IIRC.
Guess the 3rd umpJust saw highlights and what was with the catch to dismiss Labu-sub-ne? There's no way that carried. Pretty crap 3rd umpiring
LOL. As if you drop Broad based on his series to date and as if a fit Anderson gets left out. Classic.Really Woakes is massively underrated. Should be Broad that gets dropped based on recent performances except that Broad massively ups his game against Australia.
Honestly I wouldn't play Anderson again this series. He's too much of a risk and Woakes adds more to the side. This attack has easily looked England's strongest at home in my lifetime.
Went to bed before the final session but good to see that we only lost 5 wickets in the session.
Australia's horrid squad selection is now coming back to bight. Can anyone seriously say that Burns would be doing worse than Bancroft or that they feel more confident with Wade at the crease than with Patterson? Wade did make the hundred but plenty of fortune went in to that. Patterson strikes me as a lot more consistent.
So next test which opener do we drop? Bancroft or Warner? Both deserve it but we only have one backup.
But Tony Grieg said it was "OUT!".Just saw highlights and what was with the catch to dismiss Labu-sub-ne? There's no way that carried. Pretty crap 3rd umpiring
Should have applied for a concussion sub.I was drinking Tequila shots all arvo at Dick's Hotel with my best mate who's down from Qld. I was punching out zzzz's by about 8.30 last night.
The soft signal on carrying is absolute madness. It gives priority to the guy standing at an awkward angle and distance, watching live, often obscured, and a single take.Surprised there's confusion about the catch. Thought the general consensus was that it's hard to judge those on tv, but a lot look more not out than they actually are because of the 2D pictures. Either way, those are are pretty much always decided by the soft signal if there's doubt. I think that's a bit of a stupid way of doing things, since a lot of the time the umpires are just guessing, and even probably have their verdict influenced by how the fielders react. But it's just how they do it now. Broad's dismissal in the last Melbourne test was more iffy than this one IIRC.
Not that I know much about this but isn't a shortish run up to bowl super quick bad for the body?Eh, if Archer can do it let him do it. His shortish, slow run up means he won't stress himself nearly as much some other bowlers.
Not sure about Archer's action as I can't think of anyone that similar. Last bloke I saw bowling genuine wheels of such a a short run was Marchant de Lange, but he had that spine killing backwards lean in his bowling action, Archer a lot more uprightNot that I know much about this but isn't a shortish run up to bowl super quick bad for the body?
In normal circumstances Denly's runs wouldn't keep him in the side. But he has played valuable innings in tough situations, not least in this test. I'd let him open and drop Roy. Woakes could, as you suggest, move up the order.It would probably the logical decision although it would severely weaken the lower order batting. I just suspect they would find it easier to drop Denly and you can certainly argue the case that Woakes will score as many runs as him anyway.
If Jimmy were fit we’d be 1-0 if not 2-0 up. I like Woakes but it’s not even a debate between him and Anderson.He really does though. Anderson doesn't have the best Ashes record anyway, is 37 years old and injury prone and can't bat. Woakes has been dangerous with the ball and impressive with the bat.
a lot of stress on his shoulder & elbow IMO. That's not a crack at his action btw, even if he is 100% clean he must get a lot of hyper-extensionNot that I know much about this but isn't a shortish run up to bowl super quick bad for the body?
The soft signal is a joke. I've never seen an umpire disagree for the soft siginal if the fielding team claims the catchThe soft signal on carrying is absolute madness. It gives priority to the guy standing at an awkward angle and distance, watching live, often obscured, and a single take.
The third-umpire has multiple angles, can zoom, replay and vary the speed.
Yes, history has repeatedly shown us how Jimmy Anderson tames Steve Smith.If Jimmy were fit we’d be 1-0 if not 2-0 up. I like Woakes but it’s not even a debate between him and Anderson.
That's patently ridiculous. You lost the first test by 250ish runs. If Jimmy is fit, Archer doesn't play this game and Aus probably win quite comfortably.If Jimmy were fit we’d be 1-0 if not 2-0 up. I like Woakes but it’s not even a debate between him and Anderson.