I think it was touching, but it was on the line, doesn't it have to be over the line?I could swear on the slow motion his foot was clearly touching.
Nope, back foot is not allowed to touch the crease. https://www.lords.org/mcc/laws/no-ballI think it was touching, but it was on the line, doesn't it have to be over the line?
Outside of Kohli he’s the face of cricket. RespectStokes is obnoxious as ****
Starc for one frequently kisses the return crease with his back foot when bowling around the polesNope, back foot is not allowed to touch the crease. https://www.lords.org/mcc/laws/no-ball
It's the least enforced rule in cricket from my experience, I've seen footage from older test matches of people blatantly getting away with it.
So it was a no-ball? Weird that it wasn't called then considering they showed the replay on tvNope, back foot is not allowed to touch the crease. https://www.lords.org/mcc/laws/no-ball
It's the least enforced rule in cricket from my experience, I've seen footage from older test matches of people blatantly getting away with it.
He may not be a smart man. Or a handsome man. But he can cricket.Stokes, mate. The fella’s made 230 odd for once out in the game. I just don’t know if you want to be having a go at him rn
By all accounts Stokes and Smith are pretty good mates off the field.Stokes, mate. The fella’s made 230 odd for once out in the game. I just don’t know if you want to be having a go at him rn
Lucky Virat is so self-effacing and understated then, I guessOutside of Kohli he’s the face of cricket. Respect
Only because Smith hasn’t had the misfortune to be out on the squirt with himBy all accounts Stokes and Smith are pretty good mates off the field.