What about the time he failed to reach 10 in four consecutive innings in the 2015 Ashes?You mean like when he scored 48* out of 85?
Does that prove anything more than what I put up? Low scores can come in clusters you know, doesn't prove that he's more vulnerable than would reasonably be expected on 'dicey' pitches.What about the time he failed to reach 10 in four consecutive innings in the 2015 Ashes?
Yeah I know, I guess I just think the gap between him and the rest of the field seems smaller on 'dicey' pitches.Does that prove anything more than what I put up? Low scores can come in clusters you know, doesn't prove that he's more vulnerable than would reasonably be expected on 'dicey' pitches.
Over to you StephenThink Woakes would consider himself lucky to get a gig ahead of Hazlewood.
What's happened to Burns, btw? Thought he was a shoo in for the squad at worst.
Not a Langer favourite.Think Woakes would consider himself lucky to get a gig ahead of Hazlewood.
What's happened to Burns, btw? Thought he was a shoo in for the squad at worst.
Wonder if the ECB can swing a deal with ground staff/ICC to have the scoreboard at the ground show the wickets fallen as '3' as soon as the openers are dismissed, in order to lure all the remaining batsmen into a false sense of security. Then keep it at 3 until the 4th wicket falls, at which point it starts working as normal.Somebody has to bat in the top 3. Can't bat everyone at 5.
Chuck Norris obviouslyWho wouldn't McGrath be confident of bowling to
From memory (so bear with me if wrong), he was supreme on the London pitches and as useful as a 2019 England opener north of the Watford Gap. I think he did score some good runs in Durham in 2013 which was more of a bowlers wicket (again, from memory so shoot me if I’m wrong).Does that prove anything more than what I put up? Low scores can come in clusters you know, doesn't prove that he's more vulnerable than would reasonably be expected on 'dicey' pitches.
I think he'd be a big chance of falling down laughing as he ran into bowl to them (and ours tbh). One of my top three cricketing moments was when he came out of retirement and worked over Warner in that T20 years ago.
I suspect you'd have no intention of being quiet about it, Glenn.
Yeah, but look at Anderson's numbers in the past couple of years. Been terrific. Its really going to come down to whcih team's inept batting line up throws up on itself less.With England's brittle top 3, just a bit of randomness to show England what they are up against in the first test
Sobers: 117 Inn, 16no, 6268 runs @ 62.05
Smith: 117 Inn, 16no, 6199 runs @ 61.37
Also, our once in a generation bowler
Lillee: 20T, 91 wkts @ 23.65, best 6-66, SR 57.5
Cummins: 20T, 94 wkts @ 22.02, best 6-23, SR 46.8