What about now?nah man it's till very true. A streaky wicket or 2 doesn't change that
He's got a bowling average under 30 bowling mostly with the old ball. He's a massive boon for England and he'd easily have played over Behrendorff for Australia and I'd argue he's better than Cummins in ODI cricket, at least as first change. Better than any Indian quick not named Bumrah too. Only New Zealand would leave him out (he wouldn't displace Henry, Boult or Ferguson).Yeah. Since the 2015 WC at least. That's not to say he's the best middle over pacer. But certainly the best for England. Esp with Stokes playing more and more of a 6th bowler role.
Nah, would have Shami over him in the middle overs. Bhuvi obviously better as a new ball and death bowler.He's got a bowling average under 30 bowling mostly with the old ball. He's a massive boon for England and he'd easily have played over Behrendorff for Australia and I'd argue he's better than Cummins in ODI cricket, at least as first change. Better than any Indian quick not named Bumrah too. Only New Zealand would leave him out (he wouldn't displace Henry, Boult or Ferguson).
Yuck. That was horrible. Sun shadow sun pitch.Plunkett doing a James Faulkner on us.
Yeah he looked in good rhythm. Should have let him finish his 10 overs in that spell.Should have just bowled Plunkett through.
It’s hard to say. I wouldn’t be shocked if we got 260 and knocked the top off England. Also wouldn’t be shocked if they really came after us and chased it easyOut at the moment so keeping an eye on scores is the pitch a minefield or is it deceptive what will England feel comfortable chasing on this deck do we reckon?