He only played like half that decade and even then most of his best innings were when he batted up the order like a responsible man and took it to the opposition.Dhoni is the best batsman of 00s
This is far more ridiculous than Stephen's argument of Bevan being better than Sachin.Dhoni is the best batsman of 00s
This is exactly my problem with the century deifference. Tendulkar scored 27 centuries in the time period, that is 27 games that were heavily influenced by him as a batsman. Bevan has 5. Bevan was inherently at a disadvantage because he was playing in a number that was way less influencing as a batsman.Boring.
Tendulkar slapped the best bowlers and their new balls around for fun and scored hundreds at will. If he had the supporting cast of Bevan India would never lose. Just plain better.
Bevan only won like 20+ games for Australia chasing. Out of those maybe a third were from precarious situations. Thats fewer innings than Tendulkar scored hundreds in a year.
Are you arguing that Hussey was the best batsman of the 00s?Dhoni 51 at 90
Sachin 47 at 85
Ponting 44 at 84
Hussey 54 at 87
2000-09
Not taking that seriously but a better analogy would be McGrath to Warne. Warne built his reputation on doing something nobody else could do in pressure situations. McGrath built his on being better than everyone else who was trying to do the same thing.Bowling equivalent of Tendulkar would be Mcgrath having figures of 10-0-36-4 while pricing out top order batsmen. Bowling equivalent of Bevan would be Symonds jacking up figures of 5-0-16-2 at the business end.
Just having a hearty laugh. Don't take it seriously
ODI stats can be incredibly misleading.Going through footage of previous WCs I'll say that Ponting's impact with the bat is undersold by his bare WC stats. Legend. 3rd best #3 in ODIs no doubt.
Only in the case of Aussies though. ITSTL.ODI stats can be incredibly misleading.
Unlike Symonds, Warne wouldn't be not out though, as he would complete his quota of overs on more occasions than not.Not taking that seriously but a better analogy would be McGrath to Warne. Warne built his reputation on doing something nobody else could do in pressure situations. McGrath built his on being better than everyone else who was trying to do the same thing.
It's an analogy, it's not perfect. And note the language I used "did something nobody else could do in pressure situations". Nobody else could have dragged his side kicking and screaming back into the 99 world cup semi like Warne did.Haha, this is beautiful tbh. Warne was very clearly behind Murali.
Wait I thought all Indians hated Dhoni now? That's what the world cup threads had been telling me.Dhoni was better as a batsman, cricketer and human being. Bevan was hot trash.
Only when the discussion happens between indians tbh.Wait I thought all Indians hated Dhoni now? That's what the world cup threads had been telling me.