At the very least teams shouldn't lose a review over umpire's call.Umpire's call is a farce
They dontAt the very least teams shouldn't lose a review over umpire's call.
Umpire's call isn't what I'd call 50/50. It's out. Half the ball hitting stumps is to me pretty material. Tracking isn't that bad.We could do with those 50/50s going our way to be honest.
They don't lose it.At the very least teams shouldn't lose a review over umpire's call.
Don't agree. It's always in the favour of the batsman. But this is a wider discussion and not really about this game.Umpire's call is just fine; they don't lose their review.
The idea is that ball tracking has an error margin of half a ball. So that's why umpires call kicks in when there is only half a ball or less hitting the stump. It's within that error range. They're not 100% sure if it would hit the stumpsUmpire's call isn't what I'd call 50/50. It's out. Half the ball hitting stumps is to me pretty material. Tracking isn't that bad.
I'd only do Umpire's call when the distances are more like a tenth of the ball.
Nah, the margin is better than half a ball. I don't believe it's that bad.The idea is that ball tracking has an error margin of half a ball. So that's why umpires call kicks in when there is only half a ball or less hitting the stump. It's within that error range. They're not 100% sure if it would hit the stumps
Something to that effect.