dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
City's net spend this season was only 20m, Brighton's was 65mSo did City.
City's net spend this season was only 20m, Brighton's was 65mSo did City.
Not only that, but looking into it it would appear the vast majority of his signings have been hopeless. They spent £17m on an attacking midfielder who provided no goals and no assists.Didn't Brighton spend like 60m this season and have less points than last year? Sounds like a recipe for a sacking if there ever was one.
Haha yeah, and you tend to find when you delve into it that fans of that club generally don't have a problem with the sacking.It is one of those classic ones that bizarrely makes people who are not fans of that club really angry. Nigel Adkins at Southampton the absolute classic example, now of course most of them don't end up working that well but this seems entirely reasonable.
Same thing with Marco Silca at Hull, thiugh admittedly that did not end especially well.Haha yeah, and you tend to find when you delve into it that fans of that club generally don't have a problem with the sacking.
I think the Adkins reaction was partly because Southampton at the time were replacing him with a foreign no-name. I think Poch himself fuelled a bit of that with his 'my Eenglish no so good Mr Fawlty' routine that he pulled for his first 6 months or so in the job.
It's also a rare example of changing manager because someone world-class became available. Clubs don't do that anywhere near enough. Most only change when their current mediocre manager goes on a bad run.It wasn't ludicrous though was it? They replaced him with a coach who was objectively better in almost every way and one that improved the team massively. Adkins' record since, on the other hand, has evidenced his limitations as a coach.
If we're to use your "let's look at the outcomes" criteria for assessing these things, the Adkins sacking scores extremely well. It's probably one of the best hiring/firing decisions of any club in recent years itbt.
I thought Puel's sacking this season was totally undeserved too. I think fans and chairmen just get bored of him because he's such a boring man.Southampton also sack managers after finishing 8th and reaching the League Cup Final. That didn't go quite as well.
Yeah, it pains me to say it, but had Arsenal taken a more proactive approach in relation to Wenger's employment situation they could quite conceivably (or even likely) ended up with Pep or Klopp. Both were heavily linked and good odds were offered on both of them iirc. Now those ships have well and truly sailed though obviously.It's also a rare example of changing manager because someone world-class became available. Clubs don't do that anywhere near enough. Most only change when their current mediocre manager goes on a bad run.
Saying they should have stuck with Adkins is like saying they shouldn't sign Messi on a free transfer because Shane Long hasn't done a lot wrong up front this season.
Maybe when Poch is available after the Champions League Final Man Utd will go for him despite the nonsense appointment they made recently.It's also a rare example of changing manager because someone world-class became available. Clubs don't do that anywhere near enough. Most only change when their current mediocre manager goes on a bad run.
I know you're being facetious but that is 100% what United should do.Maybe when Poch is available after the Champions League Final Man Utd will go for him despite the nonsense appointment they made recently.
GIMH to comment.Having seen Mike Dean celebrating in the Tranmere end many will now be supporting Newport just to hope he doesn't get his wish at Wembley.
Absolutely right. But they won't obviously.I know you're being facetious but that is 100% what United should do.
That's on Southampton for replacing him with bad managers. The 8th place makes it sound harsh but from memory they were about 15 points worse off than they'd been under Koeman. The downward spiral began under Puel, it just didn't manifest itself so obviously because the rest of the league was ****ing dire.Southampton also sack managers after finishing 8th and reaching the League Cup Final. That didn't go quite as well.
The fact he's been sacked for basically the same thing at two different clubs is telling IMO. If you accept that a club like Leicester or Southampton can only realistically aim for 7th then at least the fans could get some decent football to watch.I thought Puel's sacking this season was totally undeserved too. I think fans and chairmen just get bored of him because he's such a boring man.
Southampton, yeah, sure, but it’s still on the harsh side given that they replaced him with someone even duller. But Leicester played some decent stuff and were clearly improving. OTOH he did have a very good group of players.That's on Southampton for replacing him with bad managers. The 8th place makes it sound harsh but from memory they were about 15 points worse off than they'd been under Koeman. The downward spiral began under Puel, it just didn't manifest itself so obviously because the rest of the league was ****ing dire.
The fact he's been sacked for basically the same thing at two different clubs is telling IMO. If you accept that a club like Leicester or Southampton can only realistically aim for 7th then at least the fans could get some decent football to watch.
Also the Spurs squad is held together by duct tape and Poch is likely to leave.Yeah, Leicester and Wolves could definitely give Utd and Arsenal a good run for their money so far as a top six finish is concerned. Chelsea are no great shakes either.