• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

A cheat is a cheat

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Didn't Smith explicitly say he was mentally exhausted after the Ashes? He's not captaincy material at all.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Sounded like a tongue in cheek post tbh.

But yes, just because you have supreme powers of concentration as a batsman doesn't mean have a captains mentality or personality. "Mental strength" seems a rather nebulous concept much like so many other BS cricketing terms.
there also seems to be an inverse relationship between being that kind of "mentally strong" batsman and actually being a competent captain tbh. the sort of mental strength that being a top batsman requires - intense inward focus to the point of obsession - has a tendency to produce a particular kind of obsessive, introverted and very intense sort of character in top batsmen which is really not that suited to captaincy; captains need to be extroverted, responsive to their teammates, able to balance lots of competing small tasks rather than hyperfocus on one big one etc.

given that what makes (made?) smith such a freak was his insane focus at the crease, it perhaps isn't that surprising that he wasn't great at the man management + leadership sides of the equation.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
there also seems to be an inverse relationship between being that kind of "mentally strong" batsman and actually being a competent captain tbh. the sort of mental strength that being a top batsman requires - intense inward focus to the point of obsession - has a tendency to produce a particular kind of obsessive, introverted and very intense sort of character in top batsmen which is really not that suited to captaincy; captains need to be extroverted, responsive to their teammates, able to balance lots of competing small tasks rather than hyperfocus on one big one etc.

given that what makes (made?) smith such a freak was his insane focus at the crease, it perhaps isn't that surprising that he wasn't great at the man management + leadership sides of the equation.
something to this. Tendulkar was a poor captain, Lara wasn't great either IIRC.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Didn't Smith explicitly say he was mentally exhausted after the Ashes? He's not captaincy material at all.
Imagine if he had to face the #pressure Sachin had to on a daily basis. Probably would've broken down in tears in public, well more often than he already does, that is.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Imagine if he had to face the #pressure Sachin had to on a daily basis. Probably would've broken down in tears in public, well more often than he already does, that is.
Thereby conclusively proving Kohli>Smith. On a side note, does Kohli get the same reverence as Tendulkar or Gavaskar?
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
KFC employee: "Sorry sir, there's a 3 minute wait on those wicked wings"
Smith: *bursts into tears*
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
it's always a tough decision to decide whether to wait those 3 minutes or take an alternative to replace the unavailable item

Smith would probably just yell out to the dressing room to ask what to do though
 

srbhkshk

International Captain
Thereby conclusively proving Kohli>Smith. On a side note, does Kohli get the same reverence as Tendulkar or Gavaskar?
No one gets or will come close to the reverence for Tendlya, but Kohli is up there with anyone else.
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
there also seems to be an inverse relationship between being that kind of "mentally strong" batsman and actually being a competent captain tbh. the sort of mental strength that being a top batsman requires - intense inward focus to the point of obsession - has a tendency to produce a particular kind of obsessive, introverted and very intense sort of character in top batsmen which is really not that suited to captaincy; captains need to be extroverted, responsive to their teammates, able to balance lots of competing small tasks rather than hyperfocus on one big one etc.

given that what makes (made?) smith such a freak was his insane focus at the crease, it perhaps isn't that surprising that he wasn't great at the man management + leadership sides of the equation.
Amla and Kallis prime examples... terrible captains.
 

OverratedSanity

Request Your Custom Title Now!
No one gets or will come close to the reverence for Tendlya, but Kohli is up there with anyone else.
I think there are a lot of people who genuinely dislike kohli. Much more than there were for Sachin. In general I think the cricket audience has become a little less obsessed with the sport than in the 90s too. The fanaticism for Sachin will never be matched again.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think there are a lot of people who genuinely dislike kohli. Much more than there were for Sachin. In general I think the cricket audience has become a little less obsessed with the sport than in the 90s too. The fanaticism for Sachin will never be matched again.
People dislike Kohli because they are beta males triggered by his alpha-ness
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Sachin was less of a superstar than Kohli. By that I mean he acted less like one compared to Kohli.
 

srbhkshk

International Captain
Sachin was less of a superstar than Kohli. By that I mean he acted less like one compared to Kohli.
Times be changing, the way Kohli acts would have been unacceptable during the formative years of Sachin, there are many who would still frown upon it - but by and large it doesn't matter that much anymore.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Agree with OS - Sachin's superstardom was unique partly because of the circumstances of that era (TVs and cable connection becoming widespread in India), and the fact that he was so young and surrounded by so much dross.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I think there are a lot of people who genuinely dislike kohli. Much more than there were for Sachin. In general I think the cricket audience has become a little less obsessed with the sport than in the 90s too. The fanaticism for Sachin will never be matched again.
if you listen to English journalists then apparently the people who dislike Kohli are a silent majority lmao
 

sunilz

International Regular
Another factor is that India were mostly ranked 5-6 throughout the 90s . So for most of the fans Tendulkar's performance was the only thing that mattered . Wheras for major part of Kohli's career India has been ranked 1-2 in both Test and ODI . So fans are less passionate about Kohli's performance and more passionate about team's performance imo.
 

stephen

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Another factor is that India were mostly ranked 5-6 throughout the 90s . So for most of the fans Tendulkar's performance was the only thing that mattered . Wheras for major part of Kohli's career India has been ranked 1-2 in both Test and ODI . So fans are less passionate about Kohli's performance and more passionate about team's performance imo.
Which shows that India is maturing as a cricketing nation. In another couple of decades they'll start picking the best team for each match regardless of what the captain thinks.
 

Top