• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Pakistan v New Zealand in the UAE 2018

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
the pakistani lower order panic just gave our (does head count) 5th choice spinner at the start of the series a 4fer to go with the 4th choice getting 5fer in the first
yeah but he should have been your first choice
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
given he has a better test and FC average than Nathan 'Goat' Lyon he clearly should be first choice for Australia. you boys should be happy to have him
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Good job on Pakistan for keeping this alive, though I think that lead is bigger than it appears (so to speak). 7/62 is not too bad in general but pretty poor by this series' standards.
 

Flem274*

123/5
if someone wants to score a 150 rather than a team effort 26-100 all out then that would be great

yasir gonna ignore the safe word tho
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
pews deleted his post before i had the chance to decipher what he was on about
i think he realised the history he was using to say NZ is ****ed was just that, history. but we're living in the Kane & Somerville world now and Australia's inability to score 200 in the UAE is meaningless
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Despite my previous ridiculously bad post a minute or so ago writing them off which I've since deleted, I think NZ are actually right in this game.

Only once has a team batted second here and won, and they had a first innings lead of 193.

Players batting in the third innings on this ground average 36.55.
Players batting in the fourth innings on this ground average 20.87.

Pakistan have marginally played the better cricket thus far but history suggests it's going to be a lot harder to bat fourth than third.
 
Last edited:

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
i think he realised the history he was using to say NZ is ****ed was just that, history. but we're living in the Kane & Somerville world now
Somehow I managed to convince myself NZ were batting last when I was making that post, despite watching almost every ball of this match so far. I realised my error immediately after posting but it was still a complete brain melt for a few seconds there.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Despite my previously ridiculously bad post a minute or so ago writing them off which I've since deleted, I think NZ are actually right in this game.

Only once has a team batted second here and won, and they had a first innings lead of 193..

Players batting in the third innings on this ground average 36.55.
Players batting in the fourth innings on this ground average 20.87.

Pakistan have marginally played the better cricket thus far but history suggests it's going to be a lot harder to bat fourth than third.
this is what i thought you meant before your original post randomly turned heel halfway and said nz would lose. after another read i thought you were being clever and saying negative 193 i.e. no team who concedes a lead in the first two digs wins.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Somehow I managed to convince myself NZ were batting last when I was making that post, despite watching almost every ball of this match so far. I realised my error immediately after posting but it was still a complete brain melt for a few seconds there.
hahahahaha. what did you think NZ had to chase then? did you just add a 150-200 runs to the current lead?
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
this is what i thought you meant before your original post randomly turned heel halfway and said nz would lose. after another read i thought you were being clever and saying negative 193 i.e. no team who concedes a lead in the first two digs wins.
My original post made sense in a parallel world where NZ were batting last -- ie. it was completely ****ing stupid.
 
Last edited:

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
hahahahaha. what did you think NZ had to chase then? did you just add a 150-200 runs to the current lead?
Nah I knew there'd only been one innings each, I just thought Pakistan were batting again next for a few seconds. It was a complete meltdown.
 

Flem274*

123/5
we should elevate colin to #3 and tell him to have a go. a bonus cameo to eat into the lead quickly would be useful, it shows confidence in him and we don't have to use the kane/taylor/nicholls/watling cards immediately.
 

Spikey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
what's the average balls faced? (that is, is the draw the least likely result from here)
 

Top