SillyCowCorner1
Moooo
Ditto
Alvin barely played post 81 didn't he? I certainly agree that overall the WI side of the 80s was miles better, but Lara of course was a superb player of spin, even Carl Hooper played it pretty well. It's probably all relative, in that the 80s side was so dominant against manly bowling that its weakness vs spin may seem worse than it actually was compared with other outfits. I just have recollections of Bob Holland causing them problems, and of course TOTAB jagging 11 for the match in Sydney too.Well the wi teams warne played weren't particularly great shakes vs leg spin and warne did ok (imo) vs them. And wi warnes time<< 80s. Kallicharan would've torn warne apart.
Its actually been remarkably consistent over the decades but just a couple of things. Some exceptional averages in earlier eras have been the result of those men playing fewer innings in comparison to more modern times. Without selling them short I think Headley and G Pollock are examples. I think the more innings you play has a negative impact on your average because its simply too difficult to maintain a 60 average over a long period of consistent play.There is a difference in the number of batsmen putting up those averages though, and it's not just due to more teams playing these days. In the 80s and 90s, no one except the truly elite put up 50+ averages. In the 2000s a bunch of good but not clearly not ATG players started doing it too.
Social definitely selling Smith short imo. Some of the attacks today are superb and honestly better than most of the 2000s attacks Ponting/Dravid faced.
Was he that good?Sivaramakrishnan
I think he started off great but then flamed out pretty quickly. So really, no he wasn't all that good which makes the schooling of Lamb even more surprising.Was he that good?
Were they bamboozled by his name?I think he started off great but then flamed out pretty quickly. So really, no he wasn't all that good which makes the schooling of Lamb even more surprising.
Big difference between Australian conditions in the 70s when compared to todayDecade by decade there is little difference between batting averages. Rate Viv and Chappell all you like but the conditions were not uniquely or even bowler friendly.
70s/80s WindiesThe last part. Warne would've cleaned up the Windies??
Hmm yeah I could see warne maybe troubling wi in Australia especially in Sydney but inevitably he'd have to play the wi in the wi. There like all other spinners, he'd be taken to the cleaners.70s/80s Windies
Most of those guys were very comfortable against pace but were far less assured when it came to spin bowling
Part of the reason was that there weren't many top class operators around (see stats for 70s & 80s spinners below) but they also didn't play them much and could rely on their pace bowlers to smash the opposition anyway
Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo
Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo
One of the reasons why Warne was such a revelation is that aside from Qadir, there had not been a quality leg spinner in the game for more than 2 decades before he came along (you can ignore Chandra as he was totally different) so would have posed far different challenges to the Windies than they ever faced
Perhaps that is why we'd be proud to have him. Import a bit of class.Why Aussies keep saying that? He is the most un-Australian player you can think of.
Can't give Dravid. He is a darling. Want Harbhajan instead?Perhaps that is why we'd be proud to have him. Import a bit of class.
Too Australian.Can't give Dravid. He is a darling. Want Harbhajan instead?
Why do you think he is the most un-Australian?Why Aussies keep saying that? He is the most un-Australian player you can think of.