I don't have an issue with the players being made aware of the DL position. It should be on the scoreboard really.Someone suggested that coaches should stand on either side of the balcony depending on whether their team's ahead or behind on DLS. It might be clever, but strikes me as something which could explode into a big scandal.
Or a chance for Hales to go cheaply after dropping a catch.This is what I was thinking maybe a chance for Hales to work himself into the team.
Yeah, I agree but doing some weird thing of standing on balconies to do it could cause controversy. It shouldn't, but it could.I don't have an issue with the players being made aware of the DL position. It should be on the scoreboard really.
I thought it was on there?I don't have an issue with the players being made aware of the DL position. It should be on the scoreboard really.
Talking about Sri Lanka?England weren't great the other day and were a little lucky to get the win.
Sounds like Bairstow may not be fit for the first test due to his football injury.
Last ODI tomorrow. Sounds like there may be a few changes to the England team to give those on the periphery a chance.
He's averaging 33 with the bat and 249 with the ball in his last ten games. He's really offered precious little with the ball in ODIs for a while (at least since his comeback), and he's probably not quite good enough for this team on batting alone if he were to stop bowling totally.Ben Stokes in one day cricket: still unconvinced.
I think he's definitely not as good as Hales with the bat, who he effectively keeps out of a full strength side. Feels like his purpose in the side is basically just being a safety net for if one of the five main bowlers has a bad day.He's averaging 33 with the bat and 249 with the ball in his last ten games. He's really offered precious little with the ball in ODIs for a while (at least since his comeback), and he's probably not quite good enough for this team on batting alone if he were to stop bowling totally.
Yeah, and I basically think that's fine as long as he actually does that, given that he'd make every other ODI side on the strength of his batting alone. If he's going to average >50 and go at >6rpo then you might as well just bowl Root for three overs every game and play the better batsman though.I think he's definitely not as good as Hales with the bat, who he effectively keeps out of a full strength side. Feels like his purpose in the side is basically just being a safety net for if one of the five main bowlers has a bad day.
Yeah I still definitely think that Stokes fits the balance better if he can bowl vaguely competently in this format, given:Yeah the only thing that would concern me with Root is that if one of your seamers gets smashed then you're suddenly relying on more than 20 overs of spin in the innings which probably isn't the ideal balance in England. But it's minor really, and it's more likely to be Moeen or Rashid who will be in need of relief.