Absolute nonsense and just reinforces the belief that the Marsh boys are judged by a different criteria to everyone elseI mean, I don’t want to be rude, but I’m 49 next month, am completely unfit atm, have a shthouse knee and a dodgy shoulder, and I reckon I could have averaged four this series. It’s jist ****ing horrendous.
To hear Marin Waugh say Shaun Marsh needs to go back and work on his technique - he’s 35 ffs. It’s embarrassing
I doubt there's anyone (who's somewhat sensible) on this board who doesn't think that this is a good idea. Unfortunately intent culture rules at CA.Honestly think we need to start looking at guys who maybe aren't as "intent" but who can bat time. At least for the moment.
No Finch? No Labaschagne?This is what I'd like to see with our three best bats now out...
Renshaw
Burns
Ferguson
Maxwell
Head
Pucovski
Paine *
Starc
Cummins
Lyon
Hazelwood
Honestly think we need to start looking at guys who maybe aren't as "intent" but who can bat time. At least for the moment. And why not bring a 20year old in who's just made a double? We've got ****ing nothing to lose!
He averaged 39.8 last Shield season and has an overall FC average of 33.8. He's not proven good enough, ever. In this situation we're much better off picking a more experienced player like Ferguson, who averaged 48.8 last season too.Labaschagne at least has a few seasons under his belt and had a breakout season last year.
But you can drop Ferguson after 1? If I was Ferguson (or a few of the other blokes) and they picked Labuschagne I'd be lividI guess I'm of the belief that you don't drop guys after two tests when they've shown signs of promise to replace them with guys who are even greener.
ferguson never should have been picked anywayBut you can drop Ferguson after 1? If I was Ferguson (or a few of the other blokes) and they picked Labuschagne I'd be livid