I think it is a huge blow for India in the field. Bumrah is irreplaceable as a death specialist and the best in the world at it right now (- and BK would have likely played anyway, which means the replacement in the team isn't one of the two best Indian death options - and Bumrah is clearly the number 1 option).Oh, Miyagi! What do you have to say about Bumrah being out of action? Do you think that Buttler et al. will make hay while the sun shines?
What about Sid Kaul? Do you think he would be reasonable at the death?There was talk above of Yadav replacing him, but he played most the IPL bowling out early as a non-death bowling option. So India may have to reassess their game plan after this injury.
Compared to Bumrah? No. Not at all.Thank you.
What about Sid Kaul? Do you think he would be reasonable at the death?
You have to wonder then - was the injury really that bad or did Bumrah wanted to avoid being carted around in T20's also considering he's not been all that great in LO against good batsmen in the past year or so, including the CT meltdown.With the roads they play the limited overs games on in England nowadays, Bumrah will be a huge miss. Very good news for England.
This would make more sense to me if Bumrah used the pitch more often.You have to wonder then - was the injury really that bad or did Bumrah wanted to avoid being carted around in T20's also considering he's not been all that great in LO against good batsmen in the past year or so, including the CT meltdown.
Should be okay for ODIsAny chance Bumrah might be back for the ODIs? It's a left finger and could just be a ligament injury.
That's a good point but he's not exactly a yorker specialist like Starc or even Rabada, his other go to ball in LO is the slower one - which frankly isn't all that deceptive, you just have to follow his action properly.This would make more sense to me if Bumrah used the pitch more often.
But he doesn't.
Like I said he's not that good with the yorker, it's a myth actually he bowls deadly at the back end. You can see any number of games against decent opposition, & while he's really good it isn't because of the yorker IMO.I'd take Bumrah's yorkers with me everywhere, especially on glass pitches.
I believe it is a fractured left thumb; don't think we would be seeing much of Bumrah on this tour.Any chance Bumrah might be back for the ODIs? It's a left finger and could just be a ligament injury.
Oh I disagree entirely. I wouldn't even include Rabada yet in the discussion of yorker death bowlers.That's a good point buthe's not exactly a yorker specialist like Starc or even Rabada, his other go to ball in LO is the slower one - which frankly isn't all that deceptive, you just have to follow his action properly.
With the competition to get into the team, Indian players don't have the luxury of feigning injury to "protect their stats".You have to wonder then - was the injury really that bad or did Bumrah wanted to avoid being carted around in T20's also considering he's not been all that great in LO against good batsmen in the past year or so, including the CT meltdown.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap1KuREwliILike I said he's not that good with the yorker, it's a myth actually he bowls deadly at the back end. You can see any number of games against decent opposition, & while he's really good it isn't because of the yorker IMO.
I'm talking about the ability to bowl good yorkers, under presuure, to good batters. In that Rabada is second to none, not even Starc. His yorkers, even in tests are deadly.Oh I disagree entirely. I wouldn't even include Rabada yet in the discussion of yorker death bowlers.
He's been preferred over established guys like Yadav (who was the best pacer in India over 2 seasons) & Shami, even in tests so you're wrong on that one. Not exactly feigning injury but perhaps being overcautious &/or protecting one's stats/ form before the main leg of the tour starts?With the competition to get into the team, Indian players don't have the luxury of feigning injury to "protect their stats".
Champions Trophy aside, he's been excellent for us.
You do remember that it's his debut series 2.5yrs back when he was an unknown entity? Also WI aren't exactly great anymore, neither is Bangladesh.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ap1KuREwliI
Slower ball is often used by Bumrah in India on slower pitches, look what he used on Australian roads.
If its slow, he will bowl more change ups, but on roads, he goes to the yorker even more than normal (which is a lot).
What part of frecency do you guys not get?Gtfo Ritter
You do realize who the reigning WT20 champs are?You do remember that it's his debut series 2.5yrs back when he was an unknown entity? Also WI aren't exactly great anymore, neither is Bangladesh.
The squiggly line underneath it part.What part of frecency do you guys not get?
Isn't it the same game where a 38 year old Nehra outbowled him, like massively? So there's two high pressure games where he flopped, gave away 25 in 2 against WI at the death & the other one last year at CT final.You do realize who the reigning WT20 champs are?
That Gayle of WI bowled is probably this game right here:
2nd Semi-Final (N), World T20 at Mumbai, Mar 31 2016 | Match Summary | ESPNCricinfo
I fully understand what frecency is. Also yorkers matter, but they matter so much more in high pressure games like a certain WC final 3rd ball IIRC?The squiggly line underneath it part.
Don't make typos on phrases like that.