cnerd123
likes this
Don't see whats stopping you from poaching them like all the other South Africans tbhWould love to have an Elgar and Markram 10 Tests 55.91, 7 100s
Don't see whats stopping you from poaching them like all the other South Africans tbhWould love to have an Elgar and Markram 10 Tests 55.91, 7 100s
Seems to me to just be shifting eggs from one basket to another. We don't seem to have a competent opening batsman to replace Stoneman or a middle order bat to replace Bairstow and we are instead choosing to introduce a third variable, i.e. the potential that our one half-decent bat may actually struggle against the new ball?I think they're considering opening with Bairstow. At least based on a report today.
With TRJ out injured it is time to unleash theThe strength that we have had for several years now (in England) has been our 6-7-8-9 batting. Playing Wood for Woakes largely eliminated this advantage.
Cook
Jennings
Root
Hildreth
Bairstow
Stokes
Buttler
Moeen/Bess
Woakes
Broad
Anderson
I'd personally rather stack the side with the extra mediocre batsman/all-rounder if it means that we are more likely to get 250 - 350 on a regular basis and you can hope that Cook and Root will manage a big score in each series to tip the balance.
Glad I'm not the only one who notices this, pretty childish stuff from RootChrist Root is such a pain when it comes to reviews. So often does that little head shake like he’s hard done by when he’s stone dead. Learning is hard.
Foakes can certainly consider himself to be very unlucky given his performances during the tour games in Australia and his record relative to his peers. My one concern is whether he is good enough to play as a specialist bat? 8 tons in 82 FC games is hardly anything to ride home about and England seem averse to releasing Bairstow from his keeping duties.With TRJ out injured it is time to unleash the
6 Stokes
7 Foakes
8 Woakes
Didn't stop them from picking Buttler. Malan's FC record isn't too flash either (though with more tons relative to games played)Foakes can certainly consider himself to be very unlucky given his performances during the tour games in Australia and his record relative to his peers. My one concern is whether he is good enough to play as a specialist bat? 8 tons in 82 FC games is hardly anything to ride home about and England seem averse to releasing Bairstow from his keeping duties.
Very nice 3 min interview of Abbas. His ideal bowlers are Asif (i hope only the on-field parts) and Glenn McGrath. So i was right, apparently he's learnt a bit of his trade from Asif playing for Sialkot.really liked what I saw of Mohammad Abbas. Reminds me a bit of Asif. Relies on subtle movements off the seam to get batsmen out.
I hope he develops over the course of the next few years and doesn't fall by the wayside.
And dropping Moeen.The strength that we have had for several years now (in England) has been our 6-7-8-9 batting. Playing Wood for Woakes largely eliminated this advantage.
Adders is agreeing with me. That can't be a good sign. England are truly ****edAnd dropping Moeen.
I still don't really get why they would have left out Mo and Woakes tbh. Sure they were utter **** in Aus and Nz in the winter but they are both very different players at home. Jeez it was only last year at Lords that Mo had a MOM performance with a 10fer and 87 with the bat.
I could understand it if there were genuine other options but there really isn;t. Dunno what you do with them next time we tour but at least still try and win tests at home FFS.
Wait what?? Do I need to rethink my opinion here?Adders is agreeing with me. That can't be a good sign. England are truly ****ed
ClearlyWait what?? Do I need to rethink my opinion here?
Still not as bad as TPCGlad I'm not the only one who notices this, pretty childish stuff from Root
I think the idea was that they wanted to develop a side that could win away as well, instead of investing more time into players they'd lost faith in outside of favourable conditions. I can see the logic there even though I strongly disagree with it -- it doesn't just dumbfound me.And dropping Moeen.
I still don't really get why they would have left out Mo and Woakes tbh. Sure they were utter **** in Aus and Nz in the winter but they are both very different players at home. Jeez it was only last year at Lords that Mo had a MOM performance with a 10fer and 87 with the bat.
Hey it's Vaughan, what do you expect. The guy just loves to rattle the nestThe logic of former players never ceases to amaze. The solution to a couple of awesome batting collapses is, of course, to drop one of the England’s two actual Test-match bowlers as a ‘wake-up call’.
https://www.cricket.com.au/news/mic...gland-pakistan-test-trevor-bayliss/2018-05-29
See the same thing whenever Aussies get dusted. ****ing batsmen, absolute protected species.
It's the same problem everywhere. These former players are basically sleep walking through their jobs as analyst/commentator/writer etc. They are all stuck at the time when they retired and recycling stuff and getting paid for it. Most of them are totally unaware of the domestic scene in their countries, state of pitches, players, who's doing well, who's not, who's the young kid everyone's talking about.The logic of former players never ceases to amaze. The solution to a couple of awesome batting collapses is, of course, to drop one of the England’s two actual Test-match bowlers as a ‘wake-up call’.
https://www.cricket.com.au/news/mic...gland-pakistan-test-trevor-bayliss/2018-05-29
See the same thing whenever Aussies get dusted. ****ing batsmen, absolute protected species.
Yeah because they can't come up with a name who can replace the out of form batsman. Teams usually have an extra seamer anyway - yeah drop Broad, pick Woakes. Easy.Sure but, like I said, hear the same stuff with the Aussies. In the wake of another collapse, all we hear is how the current batting unit just needs to be perservered with and they’ll come good and how the 3rd bowler just isn’t working, man.