All that will do is ensure we have the exact same discussion again when he deigns to drop a slightly naughty word within earshot of anyone else on the field.I don't know what will happen, it depends on how obstinate the ICC wants to be..... I hope that it gets dropped to a level 1 and he ends up on 7 points. Basically being told any more bad behaviour gets himself a ban.
At least then he'll just be missing ODIs.All that will do is ensure we have the exact same discussion again when he deigns to drop a slightly naughty word within earshot of anyone else on the field.
I wondered about that myself..... do SA have an LO series against Zim coming up he could get banned from? offer a series to Ireland, Scotland.... unfortunately he would still keep the naughty boy points on his record, but at least have a bit of breathing room.At least then he'll just be missing ODIs.
Is it really a combined tally? That's rather silly and open for abuse. What's to stop a test specialist from being selected in ODIs to complete a ban? If I were Warner I'd deck DeKock in the fourth test for a meaningless punishment but a useful reset come the next tests.At least then he'll just be missing ODIs.
One of the things I was surprised about is that the stump microphones are meant to be turned down by the broadcaster, due to ICC regulations, but often aren't. A number of players have got into trouble for 'audible' swearing, that should not actually have happened.All that will do is ensure we have the exact same discussion again when he deigns to drop a slightly naughty word within earshot of anyone else on the field.
But this case has probably the highest chance of being first in doing it. One of top South African Advocate is defending Rabada, talks of Test cricket's popularity going downhill, Rabada's shoulder touch being inconclusive of his intentions, similar or worse celebration around the world getting away.I don't think an appeal has ever been successful against the ICC. It's just a pro forma rubber stamp.