I rate him as highly as anyone, but just playing devil's advocate, do we hold it against him that he played so much in SA?
People were saying when analysing Graeme Smith's batting average it should be taken into account that he played so much in SA, which is traditionally fast-bowler friendly, especially with the new ball. If that's the case then you'd have to take it into account when rating Steyn as a bowler, just logically speaking.
I don't think it means he isn't an ATG or doesn't belong in the top 5, not by a long shot, but would you have to take it into account when regarding his statistics as people did with Graeme Smith?
By that token bowlers from the SC should get extra points for bowling on unhelpful wickets
Steyn's the most successful overseas pacer ever in the subcontinentthey do
maybe not as much as they should though. One thing I've noticed is that people tend to use where a team plays as a way to rate batsmen's averages but they don't seem to do it for bowlers as much.
eg. Australian batsman has high average, "doesn't count as much because he plays on roads". But the same concession isn't given to Australian bowlers very often. (just using Australia as an example for obvious reasons)
Yes, it isn't far fetched to rank him alongside those greats
yeah, i have said earlier that i don't think its unreasonable to rank him top 5 of all time.Steyn's the most successful overseas pacer ever in the subcontinent
Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
Wow - couple of things from that:By most accounts Barnes wasnt quick e.g. Bradman rated O'Reilly higher as Barnes didnt have a googly
Impossible to rate Spofforth
Larwood ranks lower on basis of longevity as does Tyson
Many experts rank Lindwall below Lillee whom I rate below McGrath
I seriously doubt that Davidson was as good as Akram
ok?Steyn's the most successful overseas pacer ever in the subcontinent
Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo
Well you said bowling well in the SC should get more credit, so I thought it was a relevant statistic.
This doesn't take into account the home matches of playersI've been watching since the early 90s, and in my time, I'd say he's neck and neck with McGrath and Akram, just ahead of Ambrose.
Wow - couple of things from that:
- Courtney Walsh in the subcontinent. Wow
- Kapil Dev's stats in the subcontinent are wretched.
Oh yeah, I was so focused on my overall point that I forgot I said thatWell you said bowling well in the SC should get more credit, so I thought it was a relevant statistic.
He wouldn't be guaranteed top 5 for Australia and West Indies either.If Steyn’s place in top 5 SA bowlers is not guaranteed, then SA has the best bowling lineup of all teams by a considerable distance..
I thought this debate ended years ago. He's achieved way more.Would he count as better than Donald and Pollock?
Agreed. Better than Donald imo and a fair way ahead of Pollock too.Surely he's top 1 for SA
Pollock and Donald were good too I guess